Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM68183
Volume:
10 |
10 |
Oct 2026
Pages:
1-6
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Department of Computer Science and Engineering
G H Raisoni Skill Tech University Nagpur, Maharashtra, India
Department of Computer Science and Engineering
G H Raisoni University, Amravati, Maharashtra, India
Department of Computer Science and Engineering
G H Raisoni University, Amravati, Maharashtra, India
Department of Computer Science and Engineering
G H Raisoni University, Amravati, Maharashtra, India
Department of Computer Science and Engineering
G H Raisoni University, Amravati, Maharashtra, India
Department of Computer Science and Engineering
G H Raisoni University, Amravati, Maharashtra, India
Department of Computer Science and Engineering
G H Raisoni University, Amravati, Maharashtra, India
Electronic voting systems require robust voter authentication and spoof prevention to ensure election integrity. This paper presents VoteX, a biometric electronic voting system that integrates a deep-learning fingerprint liveness detection module directly into the voting workflow. The proposed architecture pairs an ESP32-based terminal and optical fingerprint sensor with a Flask backend, SQLite database, and an EfficientNetB0 convolutional neural network for binary presentation attack detection. Fingerprint images are preprocessed into normalized regions of interest before liveness classification so that fake or artificial fingerprints can be rejected prior to identity verification and ballot casting. Held-out evaluation on 220 GreenBit test samples using decision threshold τ = 0.31 achieved 85.45% accuracy, 85.00% spoof-class recall, 80.95% F1-score, 0.9256 ROC-AUC, 15.00% APCER, 14.29% BPCER, and 14.64% ACER. Furthermore, preliminary hardware deployment feasibility on 16 R307S sensor scans using threshold τ = 0.60 (calibrated on those same 16 scans as a preliminary check) achieved 93.75% accuracy, 0 of 6 spoof presentations accepted (three PVA-glue replicas, two scans each), 10.00% BPCER, and 5.00% ACER. By embedding presentation attack detection into the biometric verification pipeline, VoteX screens for spoofed fingerprints as an added security layer, while duplicate voting is prevented by the has_voted database check without altering existing registration procedures.
KEYWORDS
VoteX demonstrates the practical feasibility of embedding deep-learning-based Presentation Attack Detection into a physical biometric electronic voting workflow. By combining an ESP32 edge terminal, an R307S optical sensor, a Python Flask backend, and a fine-tuned EfficientNetB0 classifier, the system introduces an active liveness gate that screens for artificial replicas before template matching and SQLite database queries can occur. The system was evaluated across two distinct operational settings. On the 220-sample GreenBit test set provided by the LivDet organizers, the classifier achieved 85.45% accuracy, 80.95% F1-score, 0.9256 ROC-AUC, and 14.64% ACER at an operating threshold of 0.31. When deployed on physical hardware at a calibrated operating cutoff of 0.60 (calibrated on those same 16 scans as a preliminary feasibility check), the pipeline achieved 93.75% accuracy and an ACER of 5.00% across 16 sensor-level fingerprint scans, with 0 of 6 PVA glue spoof presentations accepted. These preliminary results suggest the feasibility of a decoupled client-server architecture for supporting presentation attack detection on commercial hardware without altering existing voter registry mechanisms, though larger independent validation remains required. Duplicate voting is prevented separately via database status checks. Future research will focus on porting quantized liveness models directly onto edge microcontrollers using TensorFlow Lite Micro to eliminate network dependencies, integrating multi-modal biometric fusion to mitigate ridge-abrasion false rejections, and adopting cryptographic zero-knowledge proofs to decouple voter authentication from ballot tabulation for privacy preservation.
[1] A. K. Jain, A. Ross, and S. Prabhakar, “An introduction to biometric recognition,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 4–20, 2004. [2] D. Maltoni, D. Maio, A. K. Jain, and S. Prabhakar, Handbook of Fingerprint Recognition, 2nd ed. London, U.K.: Springer, 2009. [3] International Organization for Standardization, ISO/IEC 30107-3: Information Technology—Biometric Presentation Attack Detection—Part 3: Testing and Reporting, 2nd ed., ISO/IEC, 2023. [4] M. Tan and Q. V. Le, “EfficientNet: Rethinking model scaling for convolutional neural networks,” in Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Machine Learning, vol. 97, pp. 6105–6114, 2019. [5] V. Mura, G. Orrù, R. Casula, A. Sibiriu, G. Loi, P. Tuveri, L. Ghiani, and G. L. Marcialis, “LivDet 2017 Fingerprint Liveness Detection Competition 2017,” in Proc. 11th IAPR Int. Conf. on Biometrics (ICB), 2018. [6] A. K. Jain, K. Nandakumar, and A. Nagar, “Biometric template security,” EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing, vol. 2008, p. 579416, 2008. [7] G. Orrù, R. Casula, P. Tuveri, C. Bazzoni, G. Dessalvi, M. Micheletto, L. Ghiani, and G. L. Marcialis, “LivDet in Action—Fingerprint Liveness Detection Competition 2019,” in Proc. Int. Conf. on Biometrics (ICB), 2019. [8] Espressif Systems, ESP32 Series Datasheet, Espressif Systems, 2023. [9] Adafruit Industries, Adafruit Fingerprint Sensor Library Documentation, 2022. [10] Pallets, Flask Documentation (v3.x), Python Web Framework Documentation, 2023.
Publication Date
10/22/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
1
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
6
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...