Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM68352
Volume:
10 |
10 |
Oct 2026
Pages:
1-6
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Information Technology
Vidyalankar Institute of Technology

Information Technology
Vidyalankar Institute of Technology

Information Technology
Vidyalankar Institute of Technology

Information Technology
Vidyalankar Institute of Technology

Information Technology
Vidyalankar Institute of Technology

Information Technology
Vidyalankar Institute of Technology
Small and medium-sized travel agencies may rely on disconnected tools for itinerary planning, inven-tory management, booking, and payment processing. This paper presents VOYNEX, a multi-tenant software-as-a-service platform that combines agency resource management, booking workflows, payment verifica-tion, and large-language-model-assisted itinerary gen-eration. The application uses a shared PostgreSQL database with organization identifiers for logical ten-ant separation and supports four roles: traveler, agency staff, agency administrator, and platform administra-tor. Authentication uses JSON Web Tokens (JWTs) transported in HTTP-only cookies, with role-based authorization and organization-scoped service checks. Itineraries are generated through the Groq API using the Llama 3.1 8B model. Razorpay test-mode payment signatures are verified on the server using HMAC-SHA256. The implementation comprises 15 func-tional backend modules and 55 API endpoints, with a Next.js frontend, NestJS backend, TypeORM, and PostgreSQL. In functional evaluation, approximately 82% of outputs across 28 itinerary scenarios were judged relevant and practically usable through manual review. No unauthorized access was observed in 45 cross-tenant attempts or 60 role-permission checks. All 30 valid and 10 invalid payment-signature cases pro-duced the expected outcomes. These results demon-strate the feasibility of integrating AI-assisted planning with travel-management workflows. However, gener-ated itineraries are not automatically matched to agency inventory, database-level row security is not imple-mented, and production-scale performance remains un-evaluated.
KEYWORDS
This paper described VOYNEX, a multi-tenant travel management system featuring AI-assisted itinerary planning, resource management by agencies, book-ing, and payment signature validation in a modular monolithic structure. The implementation makes use of Next.js, NestJS, TypeORM, PostgreSQL, the Groq API, and Llama 3.1 8B along with Razorpay test-mode payments. There are four roles available in the appli-cation, with organization-specific service checks being performed to achieve logical tenant isolation. Functional testing revealed that about 82% of out- puts for 28 scenarios of itinerary generation were con-sidered relevant and usable after manual inspection. No unauthorized access was detected during 45 attempts at cross-tenant access and 60 tests involving role permis-sions. For all 30 valid and 10 invalid payment signature inputs, the appropriate responses were received. This suggests the possibility of integrating an AI-assisted solution into a traditional travel management system. However, automated inventory matching, row-level se-curity in the database, full processing of webhooks, and performance testing are still left undone.
[1] U. Gretzel, M. Sigala, Z. Xiang, and C. Koo, “Smart tourism: foundations and developments,” Electronic Markets, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 179–188, 2015. [2] D. Buhalis and R. Law, “Progress in information technology and tourism management: 20 years on and 10 years after the Internet—the state of eTourism research,” Tourism Manage-ment, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 609–623, 2008. [3] T. B. Brown et al., “Language models are few-shot learners,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 33, pp. 1877–1901, 2020. [4] J. Bezemer and A. Zaidman, “Multi-tenant SaaS applications: maintenance dream or nightmare?” in Proc. 4th Int. Joint ERCIM/IWPSE Symp. Software Evolution, pp. 88–92, 2010. [5] Microsoft, “Architect multitenant solutions on Azure: tenancy models overview.” [Online]. Available: https://learn. microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/ guide/multitenant/approaches/overview [6] PostgreSQL Global Development Group, “Row security poli-cies.” [Online]. Available: https://www.postgresql. org/docs/current/ddl-rowsecurity.html [7] J. Borra`s, A. Moreno, and A. Valls, “Intelligent tourism recom-mender systems: A survey,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 41, no. 16, pp. 7370–7389, 2014. [8] A. Vaswani et al., “Attention is all you need,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 30, pp. 5998–6008, 2017. [9] M. Fowler, Patterns of Enterprise Application Architecture. Addison-Wesley, 2002. [10] S. Newman, Building Microservices, 2nd ed. O’Reilly Media, 2021.
Publication Date
10/26/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
1
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
4
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...