Crossref DOIMemberCiteFactoropen accessissn
SJIF Impact Factor 8.659 | ISSN: 2582-3930
IJSREM Logo

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management

(Gateway to Global Scholars - An International, Scholarly, Multi-Disciplinary, Open Access Journal)

Peer-Reviewed Journal Designed to Meet UGC's Quality Parameters

HomeCurrent IssuePast IssuesPay OnlineConferencesEditorial BoardAbout UsContact Us
IJSREM

Loading article...

Follow Us

  • Google Scholar
  • ResearchGate
  • Academia.edu
  • Mendeley
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram

Journal Policies

  • Peer Review Policy
  • Publication Ethics
  • Copyright Infringement
  • Refund & Cancellation Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Journal Identifiers & Licenses

  • ISSN Verified: 2582-3930ISSN Verified: 2582-3930
  • Crossref DOI: 10.55041Crossref DOI: 10.55041
  • SJIF Ranking: 08.659SJIF Ranking: 08.659
  • Licensed under CC BY 4.0Licensed under CC BY 4.0
  • ISO Certification: 9001:2015ISO Certification: 9001:2015
  • Indexed & Cited In: Google ScholarIndexed & Cited In: Google Scholar

Contact Us

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management (IJSREM)

#62/1, New No 7, 1st Cross, 2nd Main, Ganganagar, R T Nagar, Bangalore North, Bangalore, Karnataka, India – 560032
[email protected]+91 93911 67991
logos
logos
Working Hours

Mon – Sat: 9:00 AM – 6:00 PM

Sunday: 10:00 AM – 4:00 PM

+91 93911 67991

© 2026 IJSREM – International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management. This is an open-access journal. Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
ArticlePeer ReviewedOpen AccessPlagiarism Passed
Paper ID:IJSREM68228

WEALTH TAX IN INDIA: A STUDY OF LEGAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE ISSUES ARISING FROM ITS REINTRODUCTION AND IMPLEMENTATION

Stream/Area:

-

Subject:

-

Paper ID:

IJSREM68228

Volume:

10 |

10 |

Oct 2026

Pages:

1-4

Publication Frequency:

Monthly (12 issues per year)

DOI
Digital Object Identifier
Not assigned

License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Share this article:

Authors

GSM

GOUTAM SABARIS M

Department of Law

SRM Institute of Science and Technology

Download Author Certificate

Author Services & Downloads

Full ArticlesAcceptance Certificate

Abstract

India levied an annual tax on net wealth from 1957 until it was abolished by the Finance Act, 2015. The reason given was simple: the tax cost too much to administer and brought in too little. A decade later the question has returned. Studies showing a sharp concentration of wealth at the top, together with international discussion of minimum taxes on billionaires, have revived calls for a wealth tax in India. This paper examines whether such a tax can be reintroduced and, more importantly, whether it can be made to work. It first traces the history of the Wealth Tax Act, 1957 and the reasons for its failure. It then examines the constitutional basis of a wealth tax, including the division of legislative power and the relevant decisions of the Supreme Court. The core of the paper deals with the practical problems of valuation, the definition of the tax base, liquidity, capital flight, compliance and the effect on fiscal federalism. A short comparison is drawn with Spain, which kept its wealth tax when most of Europe abandoned the idea and added a solidarity tax on large fortunes in 2022. The paper concludes that the legal obstacles are manageable, but the administrative ones are serious, and that any new tax must be designed very differently from the old one.

KEYWORDS

Fiscal federalism net wealth tax Spain tax administration valuation Wealth Tax Act 1957.

Cite This Article

GOUTAM SABARIS M, "WEALTH TAX IN INDIA: A STUDY OF LEGAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE ISSUES ARISING FROM ITS REINTRODUCTION AND IMPLEMENTATION," International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 10, no. 10, pp. 1-4, Oct 2026.

Full Article/Conclusion

The abolition of wealth tax in 2015 was a judgment on a badly designed tax, not on the idea of taxing wealth as such. The constitutional position, settled by Sudhir Chandra Nawn and Harbhajan Singh Dhillon, poses no real obstacle to a new tax. The serious difficulties are practical ones: valuation, a leaky base, illiquid assets, mobility of the very rich and the division of revenue between the Union and the States. Better data and international cooperation have made some of these easier than before, but they have not disappeared. Spain shows that a wealth tax can survive in a modern economy, yet also that it needs careful design and political will. Whether India takes that step is for the legislature to decide. What this study suggests is that, if it does, it must learn from the failure of the 1957 Act rather than simply revive it.

References

[1] The Wealth Tax Act, 1957 (Act No. 27 of 1957), India. [2] The Finance Act, 2015 (Act No. 20 of 2015), India. [3] N. Kaldor, Indian Tax Reform: Report of a Survey. New Delhi: Ministry of Finance, Government of India, 1956. [4] A. Jaitley, "Budget 2015-2016: Speech of the Minister of Finance," Ministry of Finance, Government of India, Feb. 28, 2015. [5] The Constitution of India, Arts. 14, 265, 270; Seventh Schedule, List I, Entries 86, 97; List II, Entry 49. [6] Sudhir Chandra Nawn v. Wealth-tax Officer, AIR 1969 SC 59. [7] Union of India v. Harbhajan Singh Dhillon, (1971) 2 SCC 779. [8] Ley 19/1991, de 6 de junio, del Impuesto sobre el Patrimonio, Spain. [9] Ley 38/2022, de 27 de diciembre, Spain (Impuesto Temporal de Solidaridad de las Grandes Fortunas). [10] N. K. Bharti, L. Chancel, T. Piketty and A. Somanchi, "Proposals for a wealth tax package to tackle extreme inequalities in India," World Inequality Lab, May 2024.

Editorial & Review Transparency

Publication Date

10/22/2026

Peer Review Type

Double-Blind Peer Review

Review Rounds: 2

Documents

Review Report (Confidential)
Copyright Form (Office)

Article Metrics & Impact

Article Views

1

Total views since publication

PDF Downloads

5

Total downloads since publication

Geographic Reach

5

Indexing, Archiving & Preservation

Google Scholar
Academia
ResearchGate
Crossref
SSRN
Semantic Scholar
Thomson Reuters
WorldCat
Mendeley
OpenAlex
EBSCO
Zenodo

Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.

Ethics, Compliance & Transparency

Plagiarism Screening

This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.

Funding Information

No funding information available for this research.

Similar & Recommended Articles

Similar Articles by Topic

Related research in the same subject area

Loading similar articles...