Crossref DOIMemberCiteFactoropen accessissn
SJIF Impact Factor 8.659 | ISSN: 2582-3930
IJSREM Logo

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management

(Gateway to Global Scholars - An International, Scholarly, Multi-Disciplinary, Open Access Journal)

Peer-Reviewed Journal Designed to Meet UGC's Quality Parameters

HomeCurrent IssuePast IssuesPay OnlineConferencesEditorial BoardAbout UsContact Us
IJSREM

Loading article...

Follow Us

  • Google Scholar
  • ResearchGate
  • Academia.edu
  • Mendeley
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram

Journal Policies

  • Peer Review Policy
  • Publication Ethics
  • Copyright Infringement
  • Refund & Cancellation Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Journal Identifiers & Licenses

  • ISSN Verified: 2582-3930ISSN Verified: 2582-3930
  • Crossref DOI: 10.55041Crossref DOI: 10.55041
  • SJIF Ranking: 08.659SJIF Ranking: 08.659
  • Licensed under CC BY 4.0Licensed under CC BY 4.0
  • ISO Certification: 9001:2015ISO Certification: 9001:2015
  • Indexed & Cited In: Google ScholarIndexed & Cited In: Google Scholar

Contact Us

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management (IJSREM)

#62/1, New No 7, 1st Cross, 2nd Main, Ganganagar, R T Nagar, Bangalore North, Bangalore, Karnataka, India – 560032
[email protected]+91 93911 67991
logos
logos
Working Hours

Mon – Sat: 9:00 AM – 6:00 PM

Sunday: 10:00 AM – 4:00 PM

+91 93911 67991

© 2026 IJSREM – International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management. This is an open-access journal. Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
ArticlePeer ReviewedOpen AccessPlagiarism Passed
Paper ID:10.55041/IJSREM56615

Wearable Healthcare Technology Adoption: The Interplay of Perceived Usefulness, Trust, Privacy, and Behavioural Intention

Stream/Area:

-

Subject:

-

Paper ID:

10.55041/IJSREM56615

Volume:

10 |

2 |

Feb 2026

Pages:

Publication Frequency:

Monthly (12 issues per year)

DOI
Digital Object Identifier
10.55041/IJSREM56615

License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Share this article:

Authors

1D

1Sagar Datti

2C

2Shankar Chaudhary

Author Services & Downloads

Full Articles

Abstract

The proliferation of wearable healthcare technologies encompassing smartwatches, fitness trackers, continuous glucose monitors, and advanced biosensors marks a pivotal shift in personal health management and preventive care. These devices enable real-time tracking of vital signs, physical activity, sleep patterns, and even predictive health alerts, empowering users with actionable insights previously confined to clinical settings. In an era where chronic diseases account for over 70% of global deaths (WHO, 2023), wearables promise to bridge the gap between reactive healthcare and proactive wellness. Yet, despite their technical sophistication and market growth projected to reach $186 billion by 2030 (Grand View Research, 2024) adoption rates remain uneven, particularly among diverse demographics in emerging markets like India. Central to this disparity are the intertwined factors of perceived usefulness, trust, privacy, and behavioural intention, which collectively shape user acceptance. Drawing from established frameworks such as the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT), perceived usefulness emerges as a cornerstone, reflecting users’ beliefs that wearables deliver tangible benefits like improved health outcomes and lifestyle integration. However, these benefits are tempered by apprehensions over data privacy—amid rising cyber threats and regulatory scrutiny under frameworks like India’s DPDP Act 2023—and trust in device accuracy and vendor reliability. Behavioural intention, the precursor to actual usage, hinges on this delicate balance, often undermined by usability hurdles or ethical concerns over data monetization. This study addresses these dynamics through a quantitative lens, analysing data from 100 wearable users via Principal Component Analysis (PCA) to quantify their interplay. By elucidating how perceived usefulness drives adoption while trust and privacy act as critical moderators, the research offers actionable insights for developers, policymakers, and healthcare providers. Ultimately, fostering widespread adoption requires not just innovation, but user-centric designs that prioritize ethical data governance and demonstrable value.

KEYWORDS

Wearable healthcare technology perceived usefulness trust privacy concerns behavioral intention technology adoption TAM UTAUT PCA data security smart health devices

Cite This Article

1Sagar Datti, 2Shankar Chaudhary, "Wearable Healthcare Technology Adoption: The Interplay of Perceived Usefulness, Trust, Privacy, and Behavioural Intention," International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 10, no. 2, Feb 2026. https://doi.org/10.55041/IJSREM56615

Full Article/Conclusion

References

Editorial & Review Transparency

Publication Date

2/16/2026

Peer Review Type

Double-Blind Peer Review

Review Rounds: 2

Documents

Review Report (Confidential)
Copyright Form (Office)

Article Metrics & Impact

Article Views

0

Total views since publication

PDF Downloads

3

Total downloads since publication

Geographic Reach

5

Indexing, Archiving & Preservation

Google Scholar
Academia
ResearchGate
Crossref
SSRN
Semantic Scholar
Thomson Reuters
WorldCat
Mendeley
OpenAlex
EBSCO
Zenodo

Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.

Ethics, Compliance & Transparency

Plagiarism Screening

This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.

Funding Information

No funding information available for this research.

Similar & Recommended Articles

Similar Articles by Topic

Related research in the same subject area

Loading similar articles...