Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM61855
Volume:
10 |
4 |
April 2026
Pages:
1-4
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Dept. Of Computer Science and Engineering
IIMT College Of Engineering AKTU
Dept. Of Computer Science and Engineering
IIMT College Of Engineering AKTU
Dept. Of Computer Science and Engineering
IIMT College Of Engineering AKTU
Dept. Of Computer Science and Engineering
IIMT College Of Engineering AKTU
Dept. Of Computer Science and Engineering
IIMT College Of Engineering AKTU
Pixel-Web3 Wallet is a hierarchical deterministic (HD) wallet designed for secure and decentralized asset management across multiple blockchain networks, including Ethereum and Solana. Unlike traditional wallets that depend on browser extensions or centralized servers, Pixel offers a web-based solution with user-controlled security through locally stored seed phrases. This paper explores the wallet’s architecture, security framework, and innovative features, such as real-time balance updates and flexible recovery options. Additionally, the research evaluates the scalability of Pixel and its potential expansion to support more blockchain networks. By eliminating reliance on third party services, Pixel enhances accessibility while maintaining strong security, making it a promising solution for blockchain enthusiasts, traders, and developers.
KEYWORDS
The Pixel-Web3 Wallet presents a forward-thinking solution for secure and decentralized management of digital assets across multiple blockchain networks. By eliminating the reliance on browser extensions and centralized servers, Pixel sets itself apart with a browserbased interface that upholds both user autonomy and robust encryption standards. The implementation of AES-256 encryption, local storage of seed phrases, and real-time balance updates enhances both security and user experience. Compared to existing wallets like MetaMask and Phantom, Pixel delivers similar or improved functionality while reducing the attack surface related to browser extensions. The support for Ethereum and Solana networks, paired with a modular development approach, ensures a scalable foundation that can easily expand to accommodate additional chains. Furthermore, the use of open-source blockchain libraries such as ethers.js and @solana/web3.js (Figure 1) ensures transparent and community-verifiable interactions. Despite current limitations—such as the absence of a mobile version and support limited to two blockchains—Pixel’s architecture lays a strong groundwork for future enhancements. Planned upgrades include broader blockchain support, mobile optimization, and the integration of biometric authentication. In summary, Pixel-Web3 Wallet successfully combines decentralization, security, and usability in a web- native environment, making it a compelling alternative for both novice users and experienced blockchain developers seeking a more private, extension-free wallet experience. It demonstrates how user-centric design, when aligned with blockchain principles, can drive the next generation of wallet infrastructure.
[1].Bonneau,J., Miller, A., Clark, J., Narayanan, A., Kroll,J. A., & Felten, E. W. (2015). SoK: Research Perspectives and Challenges for Bitcoin and Cryptocurrencies. IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy. [2].Antonopoulos, A. M. (2017). Mastering Bitcoin: Unlocking Digital Cryptocurrencies. O’Reilly Media. Comparison of Web3 Wallets [3].MetaMask. (2024). MetaMask Wallet Overview and Features. Retrieved from https://metamask.io/ [4].Phantom. (2024). Phantom Wallet for Solana & Ethereum. Retrieved from https://phantom.app/ [5].Trust Wallet. (2024). Trust Wallet - Multi-Crypto Wallet. Retrieved from https://trustwallet.com/ [6].edger. (2024). Hardware Wallet Security Compared to Software Wallets. Retrieved from https://www.ledger.com/ Security & User Experience in Web3 Wallets [7].Gervais, A., Karame, G., Wüst, K., Ritzdorf, H., & Capkun, S. (2016). On the Security and Performance of Proof of Work Blockchains. ACM CCS. [8].Eskandari, S., Barrera, D., Stobert, E., & Clark, J. (2018). A First Look at the Usability of Bitcoin Key Management. IEEE Workshop on Usable Security. [9].Bojārs, U., & Kääramees, T. (2022). Decentralized Identity and Web3 Wallets. Web3 Foundation ResearchPaper
Publication Date
4/30/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
3
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...