Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM60782
Volume:
10 |
4 |
April 2026
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
This study presents a comprehensive evaluation of autogenous Tungsten Inert Gas (TIG) welding for dissimilar austenitic stainless steel socket joints between SS321 and SS304L tubes, employing both manual and orbital welding techniques. The objective is to assess weld quality, metallurgical integrity, and process feasibility for producing high-reliability dissimilar joints without filler metal, as required in aerospace, pharmaceutical, food processing, and high-purity piping applications. The dissimilar combination of titanium-stabilized SS321 and low-carbon SS304L introduces challenges such as thermal expansion mismatch, elemental diffusion, and sensitization, particularly in constrained socket geometries. Critical welding parameters, including current, pulse settings (orbital), torch angle (manual), arc length, and purge flow rate, were optimized based on tube dimensions. Both techniques achieved full-penetration welds without defects. Post-weld evaluation was conducted through visual inspection, dye penetrant testing, and metallographic analysis, while mechanical performance was assessed via hardness mapping and pressure-based leak testing. Orbital TIG welding demonstrated superior repeatability, narrower heat-affected zones, and consistent weld quality, making it suitable for automated and high-purity applications. Manual TIG welding, though operator-dependent, produced acceptable results under controlled conditions and remains advantageous for field applications. The findings confirm that autogenous TIG welding of SS321 to SS304L socket joints is feasible and capable of producing high-quality dissimilar joints when appropriate process control and joint preparation are maintained.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
4/20/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
0
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...