Crossref DOIMemberCiteFactoropen accessissn
SJIF Impact Factor 8.659 | ISSN: 2582-3930
IJSREM Logo

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management

(Gateway to Global Scholars - An International, Scholarly, Multi-Disciplinary, Open Access Journal)

Peer-Reviewed Journal Designed to Meet UGC's Quality Parameters

HomeCurrent IssuePast IssuesPay OnlineConferencesEditorial BoardAbout UsContact Us
IJSREM

Loading article...

Follow Us

  • Google Scholar
  • ResearchGate
  • Academia.edu
  • Mendeley
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram

Journal Policies

  • Peer Review Policy
  • Publication Ethics
  • Copyright Infringement
  • Refund & Cancellation Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Journal Identifiers & Licenses

  • ISSN Verified: 2582-3930ISSN Verified: 2582-3930
  • Crossref DOI: 10.55041Crossref DOI: 10.55041
  • SJIF Ranking: 08.659SJIF Ranking: 08.659
  • Licensed under CC BY 4.0Licensed under CC BY 4.0
  • ISO Certification: 9001:2015ISO Certification: 9001:2015
  • Indexed & Cited In: Google ScholarIndexed & Cited In: Google Scholar

Contact Us

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management (IJSREM)

#62/1, New No 7, 1st Cross, 2nd Main, Ganganagar, R T Nagar, Bangalore North, Bangalore, Karnataka, India – 560032
[email protected]+91 93911 67991
logos
logos
Working Hours

Mon – Sat: 9:00 AM – 6:00 PM

Sunday: 10:00 AM – 4:00 PM

+91 93911 67991

© 2026 IJSREM – International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management. This is an open-access journal. Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
ArticlePeer ReviewedOpen AccessPlagiarism Passed
Paper ID:IJSREM68220

Who Belongs In The Kitchen? A Systematic Review Literature Of Gender, Space And Domestic Practice

Stream/Area:

-

Subject:

-

Paper ID:

IJSREM68220

Volume:

10 |

10 |

Oct 2026

Pages:

1-16

Publication Frequency:

Monthly (12 issues per year)

DOI
Digital Object Identifier
10.55041/IJSREM68220

License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Share this article:

Authors

Shehanaz Fathima Muhajerin

Shehanaz Fathima Muhajerin

Visual Communication

Hindusthan College of Arts & Science, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India - 641028

Download Author Certificate
Abdullah Alfazeena

Abdullah Alfazeena

Visual Communication

Hindusthan College of Arts & Science, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India - 641028

Download Co-Author Certificate

Author Services & Downloads

Full ArticlesAcceptance Certificate

Abstract

Exploring the relationship between gender, kitchen spaces and domestic practices based on a systematic literature review. Kitchens and their connection to women will be examined, along with the effect cultural beliefs, social norms, space and technology have on gender roles. This systematic literature review was performed according to qualitative systematic review methods and PRISMA 2020 reporting guidelines. Literature from architecture, sociology, human geography, gender studies, media studies, and cultural studies was used from 2000 to 2026 collecting 192 articles from different sources. Hegemonic Masculinity Theory and Doing Gender Theory formed the theoretical base of this study. The reviewed literature reveals the inequality in cooking and domestic work sharing between genders, different perceptions of men's and women's cooking activities – leisure and skill vs. routine, as well as the opportunity for women to use kitchens for their cultural and creative self-expression. The review shows that although modern kitchen design and technologies have advanced significantly, this alone is not enough to change the traditional gender disparities in kitchen and other domestic activities. It is concluded that shared domestic activities, inclusive design of kitchen spaces and cultural attitudes are crucial for ensuring gender equality.

KEYWORDS

Gender Studies Kitchen Space Gendered Space Systematic Literature Kitchen Psychology

Cite This Article

Shehanaz Fathima Muhajerin, Abdullah Alfazeena, "Who Belongs In The Kitchen? A Systematic Review Literature Of Gender, Space And Domestic Practice," International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 10, no. 10, pp. 1-16, Oct 2026. https://doi.org/10.55041/IJSREM68220

Full Article/Conclusion

The theoretical frameworks of Hegemonic Masculinity Theory and Doing Gender Theory help explain how gender roles are continuously produced and maintained through everyday activities. These perspectives show that gendered kitchen practices are not simply individual choices but are influenced by social expectations, cultural norms, household relationships, and institutional structures. The review also highlights that gendered divisions of kitchen labour extend beyond the home into professional and institutional kitchens, where women may perform a large proportion of the work while remaining underrepresented in managerial and technically prestigious positions.            Overall, the review concludes that the modernisation of kitchen spaces does not automatically lead to the transformation of gender roles. Meaningful change requires more than improved appliances, contemporary interiors, or increased media representation of men cooking. It requires a redistribution of domestic responsibilities, recognition of unpaid household labour, inclusive kitchen design, and changes in the cultural beliefs that determine who is expected to cook and care for others. The review provides an interdisciplinary understanding of the relationship between gender, space, and domestic practice. However, the reported PRISMA figures contain inconsistencies between the number of records identified, duplicates removed, and relevance classifications. Therefore, the final number of studies included needs to be verified before the review can be considered fully reproducible. Despite this limitation, the themes identified in the document provide a useful foundation for further empirical research into gender equality, women's agency, and the transformation of kitchen spaces. The question of who belongs in the kitchen should not be answered through traditional gender expectations. The kitchen should be understood as a shared domestic space in which all individuals can participate freely, exercise agency, and contribute to household responsibilities regardless of gender. The theories of Hegemonic Masculinity and Doing Gender allow one to understand the continuous production and maintenance of gender roles through daily practices. This implies that gender practices in the kitchen cannot be seen as choices of individuals, but rather can be understood from the perspective of expectations in society and culture, relationships within the household and institutions. The review also stresses the fact that gender division of kitchen labour extends even to professional and institutional kitchens where women do much of the work while being under-represented among managers and professionals. The review shows that modernisation of the kitchen environment does not imply the transformation of gender roles. To create any real change, one should not just have better technologies and designs, as well as representations of men cooking in the media, but redistribute domestic chores, recognise the invisible work in the household, make the kitchen accessible for all, and transform cultural perceptions about who should take care of other people.

References

Christie, M. E. (2008). Kitchen space: Women, fiestas, and everyday life in central Mexico. University of Texas Press. https://doi.org/10.7560/717947   Connell, R. W., & Messerschmidt, J. W. (2005). Hegemonic masculinity: Rethinking the concept. Gender & Society, 19(6), 829–859. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243205278639    Giudici, M. S. (2018). Counter-planning from the kitchen: For a feminist critique of type. The Journal of Architecture, https://doi.org/10.1080/13602365.2018.1513417   Hand, M., & Shove, E. (2004). Orchestrating concepts: Kitchen dynamics and regime change in Good Housekeeping and Ideal Home, 1922–2002. Home Cultures 1(3), 235–256. https://doi.org/10.2752/174063104778053464   Johnson, L. (2006). Browsing the modern kitchen—A feast of gender, place and culture Part Gender, Place & Culture, 13(2), 123–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/09663690600573601   Meah, A. (2014). Reconceptualizing power and gendered subjectivities in domestic cooking spaces. Progress in Human https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132513501404.   Geography, 38(5), 671690. Amoroso, S., & Alcocer, A. (2025). The kitchen as a social-spatial barometer: Deconstructing the domestic realm from a gender perspective. Interiority, 8(1), 25–48. https://doi.org/10.7454/in.v8i1.1113.    Connell, R. W., & Messerschmidt, J. W. (2005). Hegemonic masculinity: Rethinking the concept. Gender & Society, 196), 829–859. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243205278639   Dhanya, P. (2026). Spoons, smells, and silences: Culinary memory and the gendered kitchen in contemporary Indian women's memoirs. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Emerging Food Studies: Intersections of Culture, Science and Sustainability (ICEFS 2026). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-583-6_32   Emgin, B., Bektaş Ata, L., & Karaosmanoğlu, D. (2025). From work to leisure: Transforming kitchen spaces, technologies, and practices in Türkiye, 1930s–2020s. Home Cultures. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/17406315.2025.2530240

Editorial & Review Transparency

Publication Date

10/23/2026

Peer Review Type

Double-Blind Peer Review

Review Rounds: 2

Documents

Review Report (Confidential)
Copyright Form (Office)

Article Metrics & Impact

Article Views

1

Total views since publication

PDF Downloads

5

Total downloads since publication

Geographic Reach

5

Indexing, Archiving & Preservation

Google Scholar
Academia
ResearchGate
Crossref
SSRN
Semantic Scholar
Thomson Reuters
WorldCat
Mendeley
OpenAlex
EBSCO
Zenodo

Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.

Ethics, Compliance & Transparency

Plagiarism Screening

This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.

Funding Information

No funding information available for this research.

Similar & Recommended Articles

Similar Articles by Topic

Related research in the same subject area

Loading similar articles...