Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM68220
Volume:
10 |
10 |
Oct 2026
Pages:
1-16
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Visual Communication
Hindusthan College of Arts & Science, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India - 641028

Visual Communication
Hindusthan College of Arts & Science, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India - 641028
Exploring the relationship between gender, kitchen spaces and domestic practices based on a systematic literature review. Kitchens and their connection to women will be examined, along with the effect cultural beliefs, social norms, space and technology have on gender roles. This systematic literature review was performed according to qualitative systematic review methods and PRISMA 2020 reporting guidelines. Literature from architecture, sociology, human geography, gender studies, media studies, and cultural studies was used from 2000 to 2026 collecting 192 articles from different sources. Hegemonic Masculinity Theory and Doing Gender Theory formed the theoretical base of this study. The reviewed literature reveals the inequality in cooking and domestic work sharing between genders, different perceptions of men's and women's cooking activities – leisure and skill vs. routine, as well as the opportunity for women to use kitchens for their cultural and creative self-expression. The review shows that although modern kitchen design and technologies have advanced significantly, this alone is not enough to change the traditional gender disparities in kitchen and other domestic activities. It is concluded that shared domestic activities, inclusive design of kitchen spaces and cultural attitudes are crucial for ensuring gender equality.
KEYWORDS
The theoretical frameworks of Hegemonic Masculinity Theory and Doing Gender Theory help explain how gender roles are continuously produced and maintained through everyday activities. These perspectives show that gendered kitchen practices are not simply individual choices but are influenced by social expectations, cultural norms, household relationships, and institutional structures. The review also highlights that gendered divisions of kitchen labour extend beyond the home into professional and institutional kitchens, where women may perform a large proportion of the work while remaining underrepresented in managerial and technically prestigious positions. Overall, the review concludes that the modernisation of kitchen spaces does not automatically lead to the transformation of gender roles. Meaningful change requires more than improved appliances, contemporary interiors, or increased media representation of men cooking. It requires a redistribution of domestic responsibilities, recognition of unpaid household labour, inclusive kitchen design, and changes in the cultural beliefs that determine who is expected to cook and care for others. The review provides an interdisciplinary understanding of the relationship between gender, space, and domestic practice. However, the reported PRISMA figures contain inconsistencies between the number of records identified, duplicates removed, and relevance classifications. Therefore, the final number of studies included needs to be verified before the review can be considered fully reproducible. Despite this limitation, the themes identified in the document provide a useful foundation for further empirical research into gender equality, women's agency, and the transformation of kitchen spaces. The question of who belongs in the kitchen should not be answered through traditional gender expectations. The kitchen should be understood as a shared domestic space in which all individuals can participate freely, exercise agency, and contribute to household responsibilities regardless of gender. The theories of Hegemonic Masculinity and Doing Gender allow one to understand the continuous production and maintenance of gender roles through daily practices. This implies that gender practices in the kitchen cannot be seen as choices of individuals, but rather can be understood from the perspective of expectations in society and culture, relationships within the household and institutions. The review also stresses the fact that gender division of kitchen labour extends even to professional and institutional kitchens where women do much of the work while being under-represented among managers and professionals. The review shows that modernisation of the kitchen environment does not imply the transformation of gender roles. To create any real change, one should not just have better technologies and designs, as well as representations of men cooking in the media, but redistribute domestic chores, recognise the invisible work in the household, make the kitchen accessible for all, and transform cultural perceptions about who should take care of other people.
Christie, M. E. (2008). Kitchen space: Women, fiestas, and everyday life in central Mexico. University of Texas Press. https://doi.org/10.7560/717947 Connell, R. W., & Messerschmidt, J. W. (2005). Hegemonic masculinity: Rethinking the concept. Gender & Society, 19(6), 829–859. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243205278639 Giudici, M. S. (2018). Counter-planning from the kitchen: For a feminist critique of type. The Journal of Architecture, https://doi.org/10.1080/13602365.2018.1513417 Hand, M., & Shove, E. (2004). Orchestrating concepts: Kitchen dynamics and regime change in Good Housekeeping and Ideal Home, 1922–2002. Home Cultures 1(3), 235–256. https://doi.org/10.2752/174063104778053464 Johnson, L. (2006). Browsing the modern kitchen—A feast of gender, place and culture Part Gender, Place & Culture, 13(2), 123–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/09663690600573601 Meah, A. (2014). Reconceptualizing power and gendered subjectivities in domestic cooking spaces. Progress in Human https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132513501404. Geography, 38(5), 671690. Amoroso, S., & Alcocer, A. (2025). The kitchen as a social-spatial barometer: Deconstructing the domestic realm from a gender perspective. Interiority, 8(1), 25–48. https://doi.org/10.7454/in.v8i1.1113. Connell, R. W., & Messerschmidt, J. W. (2005). Hegemonic masculinity: Rethinking the concept. Gender & Society, 196), 829–859. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243205278639 Dhanya, P. (2026). Spoons, smells, and silences: Culinary memory and the gendered kitchen in contemporary Indian women's memoirs. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Emerging Food Studies: Intersections of Culture, Science and Sustainability (ICEFS 2026). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-583-6_32 Emgin, B., Bektaş Ata, L., & Karaosmanoğlu, D. (2025). From work to leisure: Transforming kitchen spaces, technologies, and practices in Türkiye, 1930s–2020s. Home Cultures. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/17406315.2025.2530240
Publication Date
10/23/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
1
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
5
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...