Crossref DOIMemberCiteFactoropen accessissn
SJIF Impact Factor 8.659 | ISSN: 2582-3930
IJSREM Logo

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management

(Gateway to Global Scholars - An International, Scholarly, Multi-Disciplinary, Open Access Journal)

Peer-Reviewed Journal Designed to Meet UGC's Quality Parameters

HomeCurrent IssuePast IssuesPay OnlineConferencesEditorial BoardAbout UsContact Us
IJSREM

Loading article...

Follow Us

  • Google Scholar
  • ResearchGate
  • Academia.edu
  • Mendeley
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram

Journal Policies

  • Peer Review Policy
  • Publication Ethics
  • Copyright Infringement
  • Refund & Cancellation Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Journal Identifiers & Licenses

  • ISSN Verified: 2582-3930ISSN Verified: 2582-3930
  • Crossref DOI: 10.55041Crossref DOI: 10.55041
  • SJIF Ranking: 08.659SJIF Ranking: 08.659
  • Licensed under CC BY 4.0Licensed under CC BY 4.0
  • ISO Certification: 9001:2015ISO Certification: 9001:2015
  • Indexed & Cited In: Google ScholarIndexed & Cited In: Google Scholar

Contact Us

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management (IJSREM)

#62/1, New No 7, 1st Cross, 2nd Main, Ganganagar, R T Nagar, Bangalore North, Bangalore, Karnataka, India – 560032
[email protected]+91 93911 67991
logos
logos
Working Hours

Mon – Sat: 9:00 AM – 6:00 PM

Sunday: 10:00 AM – 4:00 PM

+91 93911 67991

© 2026 IJSREM – International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management. This is an open-access journal. Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
ArticlePeer ReviewedOpen AccessPlagiarism Passed
Paper ID:IJSREM67518

X-MHGNN: An Explainable Multimodal Heterogeneous Graph Neural Network for Low-Latency Fraud Mitigation in Streaming Financial Networks

Stream/Area:

-

Subject:

-

Paper ID:

IJSREM67518

Volume:

10 |

9 |

Sep 2026

Pages:

1-9

Publication Frequency:

Monthly (12 issues per year)

DOI
Digital Object Identifier
10.55041/IJSREM67518

License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Share this article:

Authors

SBC

Shetul B Chandarana

Department of Computer Science and Engineering

School of Engineering and technology, dr shubhash University,juanagdh

Download Author Certificate
DMJ

Dr. Mayur Jani

Information Technology

School of Engineering and technology, dr shubhash University,juanagdh

Download Co-Author Certificate

Author Services & Downloads

Full ArticlesAcceptance Certificate

Abstract

Detecting and preventing financial fraud are driven by high-volume transaction streams, interdependent financial entities, massive data imbalance, rapidly changing fraud patterns, and the need for low-latency decisions with robust explanations. This paper provides a comprehensive survey of the recent X-MHGNN literature (20 primary research + 5 review papers) publishing from 2021 to 2026, discussing the strengths and weaknesses of the previous works and identifying future research prospects. We first discuss the importance of the graph structure and GNN for fraud detection. Then we go through several representative graph learning and graph neural network (GNN) methods, multisource and multi-view learning, heterogeneous and temporal graph modelling, explainable artificial intelligence, temporal and streaming fraud detection, contrastive learning, dual-timescale learning, efficient graph transformers, and class-imbalance handling. We then conduct several systematic discussions and propose that the next-generation graph-based fraud detection methods should precisely model the multiple types of entities and temporal transaction relationships within the heterogeneous and temporal graphs, support multimodal evidence, leverage contrastive learning and efficient graph transformers, be able to provide low-latency, stable and explainable decisions in streaming-based environments, effectively handle the high data imbalance, and adapt to evolving fraud patterns. We finally point out the opportunities for the future X-MHGNN research, for example into the effectiveness of multimodality evidence in fraud detection, explainability evaluation metrics, and ablation studies of the different graph-based and explanation-based components. We conclude the paper with a discussion of future participants and directions.

KEYWORDS

Financial fraud detection; Graph Neural Networks; Heterogeneous graphs; Multimodal learning; Explainable AI; Streaming analytics

Cite This Article

Shetul B Chandarana, Dr. Mayur Jani, "X-MHGNN: An Explainable Multimodal Heterogeneous Graph Neural Network for Low-Latency Fraud Mitigation in Streaming Financial Networks," International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 10, no. 9, pp. 1-9, Sep 2026. https://doi.org/10.55041/IJSREM67518

Full Article/Conclusion

This review looked at how financial fraud detection has changed. It started with machine learning and anomaly detection. Now it uses heterogeneous temporal, explainable and efficiency-aware graph learning. The literature shows useful abilities. Role-aware. Imbalance-aware sampling make graph fraud learning better. Heterogeneous graphs keep entity and relation types. Temporal GNNs show how interactions change over time. Graph transformers give representation and faster operation. Recent studies add counterfactual reasoning to financial fraud detection.   The main observation is that these abilities are still split in the literature. This creates a chance to build a integrated X-MHGNN framework. That framework would mix evidence, heterogeneous temporal graph learning, explainability, imbalance handling, concept-drift adaptation and low-latency streaming inference. I think the proposed framework is a research idea until we test it in experiments. To prove its value we need baselines, component ablations, time-aware tests, explanation checks, robustness trials and full operation metrics.

References

[1] B. Xu, H. Shen, B. Sun, R. An, Q. Cao, and X. Cheng, “Towards Consumer Loan Fraud Detection: Graph Neural Networks with Role-Constrained Conditional Random Field,” AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2021. doi:10.1609/aaai.v35i5.16582. [2] Y. Liu, X. Ao, Z. Qin, J. Chi, J. Feng, H. Yang, and Q. He, “Pick and Choose: A GNN-based Imbalanced Learning Approach for Fraud Detection,” Proceedings of the Web Conference, pp. 3168–3177, 2021. doi:10.1145/3442381.3449989. [3] R. D. R. Pereira and F. Murai, “How effective are Graph Neural Networks in Fraud Detection for Network Data?,” arXiv:2105.14568, 2021. [4] H. Kanezashi, T. Suzumura, X. Liu, and T. Hirofuchi, “Ethereum Fraud Detection with Heterogeneous Graph Neural Networks,” arXiv:2203.12363, 2022. [5] S. Xiang, M. Zhu, D. Cheng, E. Li, R. Zhao, Y. Ouyang, L. Chen, and Y. Zheng, “Semi-supervised Credit Card Fraud Detection via Attribute-Driven Graph Representation,” AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2023. [6] Y. Tian and G. Liu, “Transaction Fraud Detection via Spatial-Temporal-Aware Graph Transformer,” arXiv:2307.05121, 2023. [7] F. Shi and C. Zhao, “Enhancing financial fraud detection with hierarchical graph attention networks: A study on integrating local and extensive structural information,” Finance Research Letters, 2023. doi:10.1016/j.frl.2023.104458. [8] “Heterogeneous graph neural networks for fraud detection and explanation in supply chain finance,” Information Systems, vol. 121, 2024. [9] Y. Kim, Y. Lee, M. Choe, S. Oh, and Y. Lee, “Temporal Graph Networks for Graph Anomaly Detection in Financial Networks,” arXiv:2404.00060, 2024. [10] J. Lin, X. Guo, Y. Zhu, S. Mitchell, E. Altman, and J. Shun, “FraudGT: A Simple, Effective, and Efficient Graph Transformer for Financial Fraud Detection,” ICAIF, 2024.

Editorial & Review Transparency

Publication Date

9/28/2026

Peer Review Type

Double-Blind Peer Review

Review Rounds: 2

Documents

Review Report (Confidential)
Copyright Form (Office)

Article Metrics & Impact

Article Views

10

Total views since publication

PDF Downloads

21

Total downloads since publication

Geographic Reach

5

Indexing, Archiving & Preservation

Google Scholar
Academia
ResearchGate
Crossref
SSRN
Semantic Scholar
Thomson Reuters
WorldCat
Mendeley
OpenAlex
EBSCO
Zenodo

Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.

Ethics, Compliance & Transparency

Plagiarism Screening

This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.

Funding Information

No funding information available for this research.

Similar & Recommended Articles

Similar Articles by Topic

Related research in the same subject area

Loading similar articles...