Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM67189
Volume:
10 |
9 |
Sep 2026
Pages:
1-7
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Electronics and Communication Engineering
Rabindranath Tagore University , Bhopal
Electronics and Communication Engineering
Rabindranath Tagore University , Bhopal
Electronics and Communication Engineering
Rabindranath Tagore University , Bhopal
This research proposes an Artificial Intelligence (AI)-enabled low power adaptive Digital Frequency Synthesizer architecture on FPGA using Machine Learning (ML)-based optimization techniques. The proposed approach integrates a machine learning optimization framework with a conventional Direct Digital Frequency Synthesizer (DDFS) architecture to automatically determine the optimal design parameters, including phase accumulator resolution, lookup table size, pipeline depth, and frequency control word configuration. The ML model analyzes the relationship between hardware parameters and performance metrics such as power consumption, area utilization, operating frequency, and Spurious Free Dynamic Range (SFDR) to achieve an energy-efficient and high-performance synthesizer design.The proposed architecture consists of a frequency control unit, AI-based optimization controller, phase accumulator, optimized phase truncation block, reduced-memory waveform generation unit, and FPGA-based output processing module. The machine learning model assists in reducing unnecessary switching activity and hardware overhead by selecting optimized configurations during the design process. The proposed AI-assisted DFS is implemented and evaluated using FPGA synthesis tools, and its performance is compared with conventional frequency synthesizer architectures.
KEYWORDS
This research presented an AI-enabled low-power adaptive Digital Frequency Synthesizer architecture implemented on FPGA using machine learning-based optimization techniques. The proposed architecture integrates an intelligent optimization controller with a conventional DFS structure to automatically select optimal hardware parameters. The proposed approach addresses major challenges associated with traditional FPGA-based frequency synthesizers, including high power consumption, increased hardware utilization, and limited adaptability. By applying machine learning algorithms for parameter optimization, the proposed system achieves improved power efficiency, reduced FPGA resource utilization, and enhanced spectral performance. The developed AI-assisted DFS architecture provides a promising solution for future high-performance and energy-efficient communication systems requiring precise and adaptive frequency generation. The proposed architecture synthesized using FPGA design tools such as Xilinx Vivado.
[1] A Technical Tutorial on Digital Signal Synthesis, Analog Devices, Norwood, MA, USA, 1999, pp. 1–122. [Online]. Available:http://www.ieee.li/pdf/essay/dds.pdf [2] K. A. Essenwanger and V. S. Reinhardt, “Sine output DDSs. A survey of the state of the art,” in Proc. Annu. IEEE Int. Freq. Control Symp., Pasadena, CA, USA, 1998, pp. 370–378. [3] V. S. Reinhardt, “Spur reduction techniques in direct digital synthesizers,” in Proc. Annu. Freq. Control Symp., Salt Lake City, UT, USA, 1993, pp. 230–241. [4] A. Rahman, K. Abdullah-Al-Kafi, A. T. Islam, and M. Rahman,“Optimized hardware architecture for implementing IEEE 754 standard double precision floating point adder/subtractor,” in Proc.17th Int. Conf. Comput. Inf. Technol. (ICCIT), Dhaka, Bangladesh, 2014,pp. 147–152. [5] R. A. Fratti, “Direct digital synthesis of quadrature modulated signals,” U.S. Patent 20 140 079 154 A1, 2012. [Online]. Available: https://patents.google.com/patent/US20140079154 [6] D. S. Purdy and H. W. Swinford, “Apparatus for and method of forming multiple simultaneous electronically scanned beams using direct digital synthesis,” U.S. Patent 6 778 138 B2, 2004. [Online]. Available: https://patents.google.com/patent/US6778138B2/en [7] S. Sullivan, R. Veith, I. Akiyama, and Y. Fujisawa, “Triggered DDS pulse generator architecture,” U.S. Patent 20 050 138 094 A1, 2003. [Online]. Available: https://patents.google.com/patent/US20050138094 [8] J. Vankka, “Methods of mapping from phase to sine amplitude in direct digital synthesis,” IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 526–534, Mar. 1997. [9] A. V. Oppenheim and R. W. Schafer, Discrete-Time Signal Processing.Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA: Prentice Hall, 2009. [10] D. Feucht, Handbook of Analog Circuit Design. San Diego, CA, USA: Academic, 2014.
Publication Date
9/23/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
3
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
5
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...