Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM62690
Volume:
10 |
5 |
May 2026
Pages:
1-14
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

CIVIL ENGINEERING
Shri Venkateshwara University (SVU)
CIVIL ENGINEERING
Shri Venkateshwara University (SVU)
CIVIL ENGINEERING
Shri Venkateshwara University (SVU)
CIVIL ENGINEERING
Shri Venkateshwara University (SVU)
CIVIL ENGINEERING
Shri Venkateshwara University (SVU)
CIVIL ENGINEERING
Shri Venkateshwara University (SVU)
The deterioration of concrete and masonry structures due to cracking, void formation, shrinkage, aging, and environmental exposure poses serious concerns regarding structural safety, durability, and service life. Repair and rehabilitation techniques that restore structural integrity without demolition are therefore essential. Among various methods, cement–chemical nozzle grouting has emerged as an effective technique for crack sealing, void filling, waterproofing, and structural strengthening. The present study investigates the application and performance of cementitious and chemical grouts using the nozzle injection technique in old and new concrete as well as masonry structures. Experimental specimens consisting of concrete cubes and masonry prisms were prepared, and controlled cracks of varying widths were introduced. Cement-based grout and chemical grout (epoxy/polyurethane) were injected under regulated pressure through nozzles installed along the crack lines.The performance of grouted specimens was evaluated through compressive strength testing, water absorption measurement, and ultrasonic pulse velocity (UPV) analysis before and after grouting. The results indicated significant improvement in structural performance following grouting. Compressive strength increased considerably depending on crack width and grout type, while water absorption and permeability were substantially reduced. Chemical grouts demonstrated superior penetration and early strength gain in micro-cracks, whereas cementitious grouts proved to be economical and effective for larger cracks and voids. Comparative analysis between old and new concrete specimens revealed that older, more deteriorated specimens showed relatively higher performance enhancement after grouting due to improved internal consolidation. Masonry specimens exhibited enhanced bond strength and reduced seepage after treatment. The study concludes that cement–chemical nozzle grouting is a reliable and practical rehabilitation technique for both structural repair and durability enhancement. The findings provide technical insights for selecting appropriate grout materials based on crack width, structural condition, and economic considerations. Further research is recommended to investigate long-term durability performance and optimization of grouting parameters for large-scale field application.
KEYWORDS
The study confirms that cement–chemical nozzle grouting is a reliable, practical, and economical technique for strengthening and rehabilitating both old and new concrete and masonry structures. With further optimization and long-term evaluation, the technique can be standardized for broader structural repair applications.
1. Neville, A. M. – Properties of Concrete 2. Mehta, P. K. – Concrete: Microstructure, Properties and Materials 3. IS 456:2000 – Plain and Reinforced Concrete Code 4. IS 10262:2019 – Concrete Mix Design 5. ACI Committee 224 – Control of Cracking in Concrete Structures. 6. Bureau of Indian Standards, IS 456:2000, *Plain and Reinforced Concrete – Code of Practice*, New Delhi, India, 2000. 7. Bureau of Indian Standards, IS 1343:2012, *Prestressed Concrete – Code of Practice*, New Delhi, India, 2012. 8. Bureau of Indian Standards, IS 1498:1970, *Classification and Identification of Soils for General Engineering Purposes*, New Delhi, India, 1970. 9. Karol, R. H. – Chemical Grouting and Soil Stabilization 10. Warner, J. – Practical Handbook of Grouting
Publication Date
5/6/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
2
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
8
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...