Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM63818
Volume:
10 |
5 |
May 2026
Pages:
1-10
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
civil engineering
M. B. E. Society’s College of Engineering, Ambajogai – 431517
civil engineering
M. B. E. Society’s College of Engineering, Ambajogai – 431517
civil engineering
M. B. E. Society’s College of Engineering, Ambajogai – 431517
civil engineering
M. B. E. Society’s College of Engineering, Ambajogai – 431517
Civil Engineering
M. B. E. Society’s College of Engineering, Ambajogai – 431517
Flat slab and grid slab systems are widely adopted in modern reinforced concrete buildings due to their architectural flexibility, efficient space utilization and suitability for medium- to high-rise construction. However, their behaviour under seismic loading differs significantly because of variations in stiffness, load transfer mechanism and lateral resistance. The present study focuses on the comparative analysis and design of flat slab, grid slab and conventional two-way slab systems in multi-storeyed buildings under seismic conditions. The main objective of the study is to evaluate the seismic response of reinforced concrete building systems by comparing parameters such as bending moment, shear force, base shear, storey drift and storey displacement. Building models of different heights, including G+2, G+5 and G+8 structures, were analysed for different slab systems. The analytical results show that grid slab systems develop higher bending moment, shear force and base shear, indicating greater stiffness and load-carrying capacity. Flat slab systems provide architectural and construction advantages but require careful design against punching shear and lateral deformation. Storey drift and displacement increase with building height, confirming the importance of stiffness control in seismic design. The study concludes that slab system selection plays a critical role in improving seismic performance and structural stability of multi-storeyed buildings.
KEYWORDS
The study concludes that the seismic performance of slab systems depends on stiffness, load transfer mechanism, structural configuration and lateral force resistance. Flat slab systems provide architectural flexibility, reduced floor height and faster construction, but they are more sensitive at slab-column junctions due to punching shear risk. Grid slab systems show higher bending moment, shear force and base shear, indicating greater stiffness, better load distribution and improved load-carrying capacity. Two-way slab systems provide balanced seismic performance and controlled structural response compared with flat slab and grid slab systems. Storey drift and displacement increase with building height in G+2, G+5 and G+8 models, showing the need for proper stiffness control in seismic design. Overall, grid slabs are suitable for higher stiffness requirements, while flat slabs should be used with shear walls, drop panels and proper seismic detailing.
1. Patel, A., & Padamwar, S. (2017). Studying the response of flat slabs and grid slabs systems in conventional RCC buildings. Indian Journal Scientific Research, 14(2), 516–521. 2. Coelho, E., Candeias, P., & Anamateros, G. (2004). Assessment of the seismic behaviour of RC flat slab building structures. 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 2630. 3. Durrani, A. J., Mau, S. T., AbouHashish, A. A., & Li, Y. (1994). Earthquake response of flat-slab buildings. Journal of Structural Engineering, 120(3), 947–964. 4. El-Dardiry, E., Wahyuni, E., Ji, T., & Ellis, B. R. (2002). Improving FE models of a long-span flat concrete floor using natural frequency measurements. Computers and Structures, 80(27–30), 2145–2156. 5. Erberik, M. A., & Elnashai, A. S. (2004). Fragility analysis of flat-slab structures. Engineering Structures, 26(7), 937–948. 6. Erberik, M. A., & Elnashai, A. S. (2006). Loss estimation analysis of flat-slab structures. Natural Hazards Review, 7(1), 26–37. 7. Harish, M. K., Ashwini, B. T., Chethan, V. R., & Sharath, M. Y. (2017). Analysis and design of grid slab in building using response spectrum method. International Journal for Research Trends and Innovation, 2(6). 8. Jamle, S., Verma, M. P., Dhakad, V., & Prof, A. (2017). Flat slab shear wall interaction for multistoried building under seismic forces. International Journal of Software & Hardware Research in Engineering. 9. Kaulkhere, R. V., & Shete, G. N. (2017). Analysis and design of flat slab with various shapes. International Journal of Scientific Development and Research. 10. Bakale, M. Seismic behavior of multi-story structure with different types of slabs. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology.
Publication Date
5/25/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
6
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...