Crossref DOIMemberCiteFactoropen accessissn
SJIF Impact Factor 8.659 | ISSN: 2582-3930
IJSREM Logo

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management

(Gateway to Global Scholars - An International, Scholarly, Multi-Disciplinary, Open Access Journal)

Peer-Reviewed Journal Designed to Meet UGC's Quality Parameters

HomeCurrent IssuePast IssuesPay OnlineConferencesEditorial BoardAbout UsContact Us
IJSREM

Loading article...

Follow Us

  • Google Scholar
  • ResearchGate
  • Academia.edu
  • Mendeley
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram

Journal Policies

  • Peer Review Policy
  • Publication Ethics
  • Copyright Infringement
  • Refund & Cancellation Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Journal Identifiers & Licenses

  • ISSN Verified: 2582-3930ISSN Verified: 2582-3930
  • Crossref DOI: 10.55041Crossref DOI: 10.55041
  • SJIF Ranking: 08.659SJIF Ranking: 08.659
  • Licensed under CC BY 4.0Licensed under CC BY 4.0
  • ISO Certification: 9001:2015ISO Certification: 9001:2015
  • Indexed & Cited In: Google ScholarIndexed & Cited In: Google Scholar

Contact Us

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management (IJSREM)

#62/1, New No 7, 1st Cross, 2nd Main, Ganganagar, R T Nagar, Bangalore North, Bangalore, Karnataka, India – 560032
[email protected]+91 93911 67991
logos
logos
Working Hours

Mon – Sat: 9:00 AM – 6:00 PM

Sunday: 10:00 AM – 4:00 PM

+91 93911 67991

© 2026 IJSREM – International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management. This is an open-access journal. Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
ArticlePeer ReviewedOpen AccessPlagiarism Passed
Paper ID:IJSREM63818

Comparative Analysis and Design of Flat and Grid Slab System in Multi-Storeyed Building Under Seismic Condition

Stream/Area:

-

Subject:

-

Paper ID:

IJSREM63818

Volume:

10 |

5 |

May 2026

Pages:

1-10

Publication Frequency:

Monthly (12 issues per year)

DOI
Digital Object Identifier
Not assigned

License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Share this article:

Authors

AS

Akshay Solanke

civil engineering

M. B. E. Society’s College of Engineering, Ambajogai – 431517

Download Author Certificate
PPAV

Prof. P. A. Vedpathak

civil engineering

M. B. E. Society’s College of Engineering, Ambajogai – 431517

Download Co-Author Certificate
PJMC

Prof. J. M. Chavan

civil engineering

M. B. E. Society’s College of Engineering, Ambajogai – 431517

Download Co-Author Certificate
DVSR

Dr. V. S. Rajamanya

civil engineering

M. B. E. Society’s College of Engineering, Ambajogai – 431517

Download Co-Author Certificate

Mentors

PJMC

Prof. J M Chavan

Civil Engineering

M. B. E. Society’s College of Engineering, Ambajogai – 431517

Download Mentor Certificate

Author Services & Downloads

Full ArticlesAcceptance Certificate

Abstract

Flat slab and grid slab systems are widely adopted in modern reinforced concrete buildings due to their architectural flexibility, efficient space utilization and suitability for medium- to high-rise construction. However, their behaviour under seismic loading differs significantly because of variations in stiffness, load transfer mechanism and lateral resistance. The present study focuses on the comparative analysis and design of flat slab, grid slab and conventional two-way slab systems in multi-storeyed buildings under seismic conditions. The main objective of the study is to evaluate the seismic response of reinforced concrete building systems by comparing parameters such as bending moment, shear force, base shear, storey drift and storey displacement. Building models of different heights, including G+2, G+5 and G+8 structures, were analysed for different slab systems. The analytical results show that grid slab systems develop higher bending moment, shear force and base shear, indicating greater stiffness and load-carrying capacity. Flat slab systems provide architectural and construction advantages but require careful design against punching shear and lateral deformation. Storey drift and displacement increase with building height, confirming the importance of stiffness control in seismic design. The study concludes that slab system selection plays a critical role in improving seismic performance and structural stability of multi-storeyed buildings.

KEYWORDS

Keywords: Flat slab Grid slab Two-way slab Seismic analysis Storey drift Base shear Multi-storeyed building.

Cite This Article

Akshay Solanke, Prof. P. A. Vedpathak, Prof. J. M. Chavan, Dr. V. S. Rajamanya, Prof. J M Chavan, "Comparative Analysis and Design of Flat and Grid Slab System in Multi-Storeyed Building Under Seismic Condition," International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 1-10, May 2026.

Full Article/Conclusion

The study concludes that the seismic performance of slab systems depends on stiffness, load transfer mechanism, structural configuration and lateral force resistance. Flat slab systems provide architectural flexibility, reduced floor height and faster construction, but they are more sensitive at slab-column junctions due to punching shear risk. Grid slab systems show higher bending moment, shear force and base shear, indicating greater stiffness, better load distribution and improved load-carrying capacity. Two-way slab systems provide balanced seismic performance and controlled structural response compared with flat slab and grid slab systems. Storey drift and displacement increase with building height in G+2, G+5 and G+8 models, showing the need for proper stiffness control in seismic design. Overall, grid slabs are suitable for higher stiffness requirements, while flat slabs should be used with shear walls, drop panels and proper seismic detailing.

References

1.        Patel, A., & Padamwar, S. (2017). Studying the response of flat slabs and grid slabs systems in conventional RCC buildings. Indian Journal Scientific Research, 14(2), 516–521. 2.        Coelho, E., Candeias, P., & Anamateros, G. (2004). Assessment of the seismic behaviour of RC flat slab building structures. 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 2630. 3.        Durrani, A. J., Mau, S. T., AbouHashish, A. A., & Li, Y. (1994). Earthquake response of flat-slab buildings. Journal of Structural Engineering, 120(3), 947–964. 4.        El-Dardiry, E., Wahyuni, E., Ji, T., & Ellis, B. R. (2002). Improving FE models of a long-span flat concrete floor using natural frequency measurements. Computers and Structures, 80(27–30), 2145–2156. 5.        Erberik, M. A., & Elnashai, A. S. (2004). Fragility analysis of flat-slab structures. Engineering Structures, 26(7), 937–948. 6.        Erberik, M. A., & Elnashai, A. S. (2006). Loss estimation analysis of flat-slab structures. Natural Hazards Review, 7(1), 26–37. 7.        Harish, M. K., Ashwini, B. T., Chethan, V. R., & Sharath, M. Y. (2017). Analysis and design of grid slab in building using response spectrum method. International Journal for Research Trends and Innovation, 2(6). 8.        Jamle, S., Verma, M. P., Dhakad, V., & Prof, A. (2017). Flat slab shear wall interaction for multistoried building under seismic forces. International Journal of Software & Hardware Research in Engineering. 9.        Kaulkhere, R. V., & Shete, G. N. (2017). Analysis and design of flat slab with various shapes. International Journal of Scientific Development and Research. 10.     Bakale, M. Seismic behavior of multi-story structure with different types of slabs. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology.

Editorial & Review Transparency

Publication Date

5/25/2026

Peer Review Type

Double-Blind Peer Review

Review Rounds: 2

Documents

Review Report (Confidential)
Copyright Form (Office)

Article Metrics & Impact

Article Views

0

Total views since publication

PDF Downloads

6

Total downloads since publication

Geographic Reach

5

Indexing, Archiving & Preservation

Google Scholar
Academia
ResearchGate
Crossref
SSRN
Semantic Scholar
Thomson Reuters
WorldCat
Mendeley
OpenAlex
EBSCO
Zenodo

Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.

Ethics, Compliance & Transparency

Plagiarism Screening

This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.

Funding Information

No funding information available for this research.

Similar & Recommended Articles

Similar Articles by Topic

Related research in the same subject area

Loading similar articles...