Crossref DOIMemberCiteFactoropen accessissn
SJIF Impact Factor 8.659 | ISSN: 2582-3930
IJSREM Logo

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management

(Gateway to Global Scholars - An International, Scholarly, Multi-Disciplinary, Open Access Journal)

Peer-Reviewed Journal Designed to Meet UGC's Quality Parameters

HomeCurrent IssuePast IssuesPay OnlineConferencesEditorial BoardAbout UsContact Us
IJSREM

Loading article...

Follow Us

  • Google Scholar
  • ResearchGate
  • Academia.edu
  • Mendeley
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram

Journal Policies

  • Peer Review Policy
  • Publication Ethics
  • Copyright Infringement
  • Refund & Cancellation Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Journal Identifiers & Licenses

  • ISSN Verified: 2582-3930ISSN Verified: 2582-3930
  • Crossref DOI: 10.55041Crossref DOI: 10.55041
  • SJIF Ranking: 08.659SJIF Ranking: 08.659
  • Licensed under CC BY 4.0Licensed under CC BY 4.0
  • ISO Certification: 9001:2015ISO Certification: 9001:2015
  • Indexed & Cited In: Google ScholarIndexed & Cited In: Google Scholar

Contact Us

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management (IJSREM)

#62/1, New No 7, 1st Cross, 2nd Main, Ganganagar, R T Nagar, Bangalore North, Bangalore, Karnataka, India – 560032
[email protected]+91 93911 67991
logos
logos
Working Hours

Mon – Sat: 9:00 AM – 6:00 PM

Sunday: 10:00 AM – 4:00 PM

+91 93911 67991

© 2026 IJSREM – International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management. This is an open-access journal. Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
ArticlePeer ReviewedOpen AccessPlagiarism Passed
Paper ID:IJSREM62882

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF A G+15 RCC RESIDENTIAL BUILDING WITH AND WITHOUT SHEAR WALL USING E TABS

Stream/Area:

-

Subject:

-

Paper ID:

IJSREM62882

Volume:

10 |

5 |

May 2026

Pages:

1-12

Publication Frequency:

Monthly (12 issues per year)

DOI
Digital Object Identifier
10.55041/IJSREM62882

License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Share this article:

Authors

CS

Ch. SRAVANI

Civil Engineering

University College of Engineering, JNTUK, Kakinada

Download Author Certificate
GV

G. VARSHITHA

Civil Engineering

University College of Engineering, JNTUK, Kakinada

Download Co-Author Certificate
DN

D. NANDINI

Civil Engineering

University College of Engineering, JNTUK, Kakinada

Download Co-Author Certificate
VK

V. KRISHNAVENI

Civil Engineering

University College of Engineering, JNTUK, Kakinada

Download Co-Author Certificate

Mentors

DSSB

Dr. S. SHAMEEM BANU

Civil Engineering

University College of Engineering, JNTUK, Kakinada

Download Mentor Certificate

Author Services & Downloads

Full ArticlesAcceptance Certificate

Abstract

The rapid growth of high-rise buildings due to urbanization, population increase, and limited land availability has significantly influenced modern construction practices. Tall buildings are subjected to various lateral loads such as wind and earthquakes, which create major challenges in maintaining structural stability and safety. Shear walls are widely used in reinforced concrete (RCC) structures as an effective structural element to resist lateral forces and improve the overall strength and durability of buildings. This study focuses on the comparative performance analysis of a G+15 RCC residential building with and without shear walls. The main objective is to evaluate the influence of shear walls on the structural behaviour of multi-storey buildings under lateral loads. The building models were developed and analysed using ETABS software, which is based on the finite element method, to simulate real structural behaviour accurately. The analysis was carried out as per IS 1893 (Part 1): 2016 guidelines to determine the response of the structure under seismic and wind loads. Important parameters such as storey displacement, storey drift, and base shear were considered to assess the structural performance. Different shear wall locations, such as at the lift core and building periphery, were also studied to identify the most effective placement for improving building stability and stiffness. The results of the comparative study indicate that the inclusion of shear walls significantly reduces lateral displacement and storey drift, thereby enhancing the stiffness and seismic resistance of the structure. Proper placement of shear walls improves safety, serviceability, and structural efficiency of high-rise buildings. This study provides valuable guidance for engineers and designers in selecting suitable structural systems for G+15 RCC residential buildings while ensuring safety, economy, and performance.

KEYWORDS

Keywords: Shear wall Storey displacement Storey drift Base shear Structural schemes.

Cite This Article

Ch. SRAVANI, G. VARSHITHA, D. NANDINI, V. KRISHNAVENI, Dr. S. SHAMEEM BANU, "COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF A G+15 RCC RESIDENTIAL BUILDING WITH AND WITHOUT SHEAR WALL USING E TABS," International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 1-12, May 2026. https://doi.org/10.55041/IJSREM62882

Full Article/Conclusion

From the analysis of the G+15 building with and without shear walls, the following conclusions are drawn: • Storey displacement is significantly reduced with the provision of shear walls, especially in the upper storeys, indicating improved structural stiffness and control over lateral movement. • Storey drift values are considerably lower in the model with shear walls, ensuring that the structure satisfies permissible drift limits and performs better under seismic loading. • The structure without shear walls shows higher deformation and irregular drift distribution, making it more vulnerable to seismic effects. • Base shear and overturning moments are effectively resisted in the shear wall model due to increased rigidity and better load transfer mechanism. • Shear walls act as primary lateral load-resisting elements, thereby reducing the load and stress on beams and columns and enhancing overall structural efficiency. • Proper placement of shear walls in both X and Y directions helps in minimizing torsional effects and ensures uniform distribution of seismic forces. • Critical response parameters such as displacement, drift, and overturning are well controlled in the shear wall model, indicating improved seismic performance. • Overall, the study concludes that the G+15 building with shear walls is safer, more stable, and better suited for seismic-resistant design compared to the structure without shear walls. The use of shear walls is essential for enhancing strength, stiffness, and overall performance in earthquake-prone regions.

References

Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures by S.K. Duggal: Provides practical guidance on the design and detailing of reinforced concrete (RC) shear walls according to Indian Standards (IS codes). •           Dynamics of Structures by A.K. Chopra: Often used for fundamental seismic analysis, including time-history and response spectrum analysis of shear wall systems. •           Bureau of Indian Standards, IS 456: 2000, Plain and Reinforced Concrete – Code of Practice, New Delhi. •           Bureau of Indian Standards, IS 1893: 2016, Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures, Bureau of Indian Standards •           Bureau of Indian Standards, IS 875-Part 1: 2013, Code of Practice for Design Loads (other than earthquake) for buildings & structures – Dead Load, Bureau of Indian Standards •           Bureau of Indian Standards, IS 875-Part 2: 2013, Code of Practice for Design Loads (other than earthquake) for buildings & structures – Imposed Load, Bureau of Indian Standards •           Bureau of Indian Standards, IS 875-Part 3: 2015, Code of Practice for Design Loads (other than earthquake) for buildings & structures – Wind Load, Bureau of Indian Standards •           ETABS User Manual, CSI Computers and Structures Inc. • Shear walls improve stiffness, strength, and overall seismic resistance of the building. • The results clearly indicate that shear walls are essential for high-rise buildings in seismic regions.

Editorial & Review Transparency

Publication Date

5/8/2026

Peer Review Type

Double-Blind Peer Review

Review Rounds: 2

Documents

Review Report (Confidential)
Copyright Form (Office)

Article Metrics & Impact

Article Views

0

Total views since publication

PDF Downloads

5

Total downloads since publication

Geographic Reach

5

Indexing, Archiving & Preservation

Google Scholar
Academia
ResearchGate
Crossref
SSRN
Semantic Scholar
Thomson Reuters
WorldCat
Mendeley
OpenAlex
EBSCO
Zenodo

Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.

Ethics, Compliance & Transparency

Plagiarism Screening

This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.

Funding Information

No funding information available for this research.

Similar & Recommended Articles

Similar Articles by Topic

Related research in the same subject area

Loading similar articles...