Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM62882
Volume:
10 |
5 |
May 2026
Pages:
1-12
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Civil Engineering
University College of Engineering, JNTUK, Kakinada
Civil Engineering
University College of Engineering, JNTUK, Kakinada
Civil Engineering
University College of Engineering, JNTUK, Kakinada
Civil Engineering
University College of Engineering, JNTUK, Kakinada
Civil Engineering
University College of Engineering, JNTUK, Kakinada
The rapid growth of high-rise buildings due to urbanization, population increase, and limited land availability has significantly influenced modern construction practices. Tall buildings are subjected to various lateral loads such as wind and earthquakes, which create major challenges in maintaining structural stability and safety. Shear walls are widely used in reinforced concrete (RCC) structures as an effective structural element to resist lateral forces and improve the overall strength and durability of buildings. This study focuses on the comparative performance analysis of a G+15 RCC residential building with and without shear walls. The main objective is to evaluate the influence of shear walls on the structural behaviour of multi-storey buildings under lateral loads. The building models were developed and analysed using ETABS software, which is based on the finite element method, to simulate real structural behaviour accurately. The analysis was carried out as per IS 1893 (Part 1): 2016 guidelines to determine the response of the structure under seismic and wind loads. Important parameters such as storey displacement, storey drift, and base shear were considered to assess the structural performance. Different shear wall locations, such as at the lift core and building periphery, were also studied to identify the most effective placement for improving building stability and stiffness. The results of the comparative study indicate that the inclusion of shear walls significantly reduces lateral displacement and storey drift, thereby enhancing the stiffness and seismic resistance of the structure. Proper placement of shear walls improves safety, serviceability, and structural efficiency of high-rise buildings. This study provides valuable guidance for engineers and designers in selecting suitable structural systems for G+15 RCC residential buildings while ensuring safety, economy, and performance.
KEYWORDS
From the analysis of the G+15 building with and without shear walls, the following conclusions are drawn: • Storey displacement is significantly reduced with the provision of shear walls, especially in the upper storeys, indicating improved structural stiffness and control over lateral movement. • Storey drift values are considerably lower in the model with shear walls, ensuring that the structure satisfies permissible drift limits and performs better under seismic loading. • The structure without shear walls shows higher deformation and irregular drift distribution, making it more vulnerable to seismic effects. • Base shear and overturning moments are effectively resisted in the shear wall model due to increased rigidity and better load transfer mechanism. • Shear walls act as primary lateral load-resisting elements, thereby reducing the load and stress on beams and columns and enhancing overall structural efficiency. • Proper placement of shear walls in both X and Y directions helps in minimizing torsional effects and ensures uniform distribution of seismic forces. • Critical response parameters such as displacement, drift, and overturning are well controlled in the shear wall model, indicating improved seismic performance. • Overall, the study concludes that the G+15 building with shear walls is safer, more stable, and better suited for seismic-resistant design compared to the structure without shear walls. The use of shear walls is essential for enhancing strength, stiffness, and overall performance in earthquake-prone regions.
Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures by S.K. Duggal: Provides practical guidance on the design and detailing of reinforced concrete (RC) shear walls according to Indian Standards (IS codes). • Dynamics of Structures by A.K. Chopra: Often used for fundamental seismic analysis, including time-history and response spectrum analysis of shear wall systems. • Bureau of Indian Standards, IS 456: 2000, Plain and Reinforced Concrete – Code of Practice, New Delhi. • Bureau of Indian Standards, IS 1893: 2016, Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures, Bureau of Indian Standards • Bureau of Indian Standards, IS 875-Part 1: 2013, Code of Practice for Design Loads (other than earthquake) for buildings & structures – Dead Load, Bureau of Indian Standards • Bureau of Indian Standards, IS 875-Part 2: 2013, Code of Practice for Design Loads (other than earthquake) for buildings & structures – Imposed Load, Bureau of Indian Standards • Bureau of Indian Standards, IS 875-Part 3: 2015, Code of Practice for Design Loads (other than earthquake) for buildings & structures – Wind Load, Bureau of Indian Standards • ETABS User Manual, CSI Computers and Structures Inc. • Shear walls improve stiffness, strength, and overall seismic resistance of the building. • The results clearly indicate that shear walls are essential for high-rise buildings in seismic regions.
Publication Date
5/8/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
5
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...