Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM67205
Volume:
10 |
9 |
Sep 2026
Pages:
1-10
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Department of Management Studies (MBA),
Centre for Post Graduate Studies, Muddenahalli, Chikkaballapur, Visvesvaraya Technological University, Belagavi, Karnataka State, India
Department of Management Studies (MBA),
Centre for Post Graduate Studies, Muddenahalli, Chikkaballapur, Visvesvaraya Technological University, Belagavi, Karnataka State, India
Employee well-being has become an increasingly important factor in determining organizational effectiveness and sustainable business performance. In today's dynamic and competitive work environment, organizations are recognizing that employee well-being extends beyond physical health to include mental, emotional, and social well-being. A workforce that experiences a healthy work environment, supportive leadership, work-life balance, job security, and opportunities for personal and professional growth is more likely to remain motivated, engaged, and committed to organizational objectives. Consequently, employee well-being has emerged as a strategic priority for organizations seeking to improve workplace productivity and maintain a competitive advantage. The review indicates that employee well-being has a positive and meaningful influence on workplace productivity. Employees who experience supportive working conditions, effective communication, fair compensation, recognition, psychological safety, and opportunities for skill development demonstrate higher levels of motivation, commitment, efficiency, and job performance. The findings further suggest that organizations that invest in employee well-being experience reduced absenteeism, lower employee turnover, stronger teamwork, improved innovation, and higher overall productivity. Conversely, poor well-being is associated with stress, burnout, low morale, reduced work quality, and declining organizational performance. The study concludes that employee well-being should be regarded as a strategic organizational investment rather than an employee welfare initiative alone. Organizations that promote a healthy and supportive work environment are more likely to achieve sustainable productivity and long-term success. Although the study is limited to secondary data, it provides valuable insights for managers, human resource professionals, researchers, and policymakers in designing effective workplace practices that improve employee well-being and organizational performance. Future research may extend this work through empirical investigations across different industries and organizational contexts.
KEYWORDS
Employee well-being has emerged as a critical factor influencing workplace productivity and overall organizational success. The present study examined the relationship between employee well-being and workplace productivity through an extensive review of secondary data obtained from academic journals, books, and other credible sources. The findings consistently indicate that organizations that prioritize the physical, mental, emotional, and social well-being of their employees are more likely to achieve higher levels of productivity, employee engagement, job satisfaction, and organizational performance. Employees who work in supportive environments with effective leadership, fair compensation, opportunities for career growth, healthy workplace relationships, and work-life balance demonstrate greater motivation, commitment, and efficiency in performing their responsibilities. The study also highlights that employee well-being extends beyond the absence of illness or workplace stress. It encompasses a positive organizational culture that values employee health, recognizes individual contributions, promotes psychological safety, and encourages continuous learning and development. Such an environment enables employees to perform confidently, collaborate effectively, adapt to organizational changes, and contribute to innovation and long-term organizational growth. Conversely, poor employee well-being often results in stress, burnout, absenteeism, reduced morale, lower productivity, and higher employee turnover, ultimately affecting organizational performance and sustainability. Based on the review of existing literature, the study concludes that employee well-being should be regarded as a strategic organizational investment rather than merely a human resource initiative. Organizations that implement comprehensive well-being programs, strengthen leadership support, encourage work-life balance, and maintain positive workplace relationships can build a healthier, more productive, and more resilient workforce. Although this study is limited to secondary data, it provides valuable insights for managers, human resource professionals, researchers, and policymakers. Future studies may further examine this relationship using primary data across different industries and organizational settings to provide broader empirical evidence and practical recommendations.
Bhoir, M., & Sinha, V. (2024). Employee well-being human resource practices: A systematic literature review and directions for future research. Future Business Journal, 10, 95. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-024-00382-w Bloom, N., Han, R., & Liang, J. (2024). Hybrid working from home improves retention without damaging performance. Nature, 630(8016), 920–925. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07500-2 Dessler, G. (2020). Human resource management (16th ed.). Pearson. Gupta, J., Suresh, R., Krishnappa, R., Sharma, A., & Khalid, M. R. P. (2024). Employee well-being initiatives: A critical analysis of HRM practices. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice. Mendoza Ocasal, D. L., González, M., & Santos, N. Q. (2024). Subjective well-being and labour productivity: A global and organizational perspective. Revista de Administração de Empresas, 64(5). https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-759020240504 Noe, R. A. (2022). Employee training and development (9th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education. Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2023). Organizational behaviour (19th ed.). Pearson. Sadeghi, S. (2024). Employee well-being in the age of AI: Perceptions, concerns, behaviours, and outcomes. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.04796 The relationship between well-being at work and performance: A systematic literature review. (2025). Journal of Management Development, 45(2), 278–307. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMD-12-2024-0433 Venz, L., Hommelhoff, S., & Richter, A. (2024). Mental health and well-being at work: A systematic review of literature and directions for future research. Human Resource Management Review, 34(1), 100998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2023.100998 Vinson, D. W., Arcan, M., Niland, D. P., & Delahunty, F. (2024). Towards sustainable workplace mental health: A novel approach to early intervention and support. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.01592 Well-being at work and employee flourishing: A review and research agenda. (2024). International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 33(8), 2592–2625. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-04-2024-4455 Yukl, G. (2020). Leadership in organizations (9th ed.). Pearson.
Publication Date
9/11/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
4
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...