Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM67218
Volume:
10 |
9 |
Sep 2026
Pages:
1-4
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Education
Teacher's Training College, Bhagalpur
Many arguments are being forwarded in favour of and against the No Detention Policy (NDP) in elementary education. Before going to debate these arguments, we should consider two other important provisions of the Right to Education Act (RTE) which are directly related to the NDP: Age-Appropriate Class, Continuous & Comprehensive Evaluation (CCE). All these three provisions need to be considered together when we argue for/or against the NDP. Indeed, the removal of NDP due to low learning achievements of the students is the result of a lack of teachers and infrastructure in the school, which seems to be shifted onto the students. The punishment for the weakness of the system, as well as the poor economic and social backwardness of parents, should not be transferred upon the student by adopting the removal of no detention policy.
KEYWORDS
While initially a significant step toward ensuring education for all, the No Detention Policy or the NDP has been a subject of debate due to concerns about its impact on academic standards. The withdrawal of this policy, especially in light of the NEP 2020, is likely to lead to a more structured educational framework, but it must be carefully managed to avoid alienating disadvantaged students. For the policy to contribute positively to the goals of universal education and quality learning outcomes, it is essential that remedial interventions, teacher training, and continuous evaluation mechanisms are put in place to support all students in their academic journey.
1. Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 – Ministry of Education, Government of India [https://www.education.gov.in/rte] 2. National Education Policy 2020 – Ministry of Education, Government of India [https://www.education.gov.in/nep-2020] 3. Annual Status of Education Report (ASER) 2019 – ASER Centre [https://www.asercentre.org] 4. RTE Amendment Act, 2019 – Ministry of Law and Justice, Government of India [https://legislative.gov.in] National Achievement Survey 2017 –NCERT [https://www.ncert.nic.in
Publication Date
9/15/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
1
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
5
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...