Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM66686
Volume:
10 |
8 |
Aug 2026
Pages:
1-21
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Quality Assurance
JMCT Institute of Pharmacy, Wadala road, Nashik- 422006
Quality Assurance
JMCT Institute of Pharmacy, Wadala road, Nashik- 422006
Quality Assurance
JMCT Institute of Pharmacy, Wadala road, Nashik- 422006
Process validation is a fundamental element of pharmaceutical quality assurance that ensures manufacturing processes consistently produce products meeting predefined quality standards. In recent years, regulatory agencies have shifted from traditional end-product testing toward a lifecycle-based approach that focuses on building quality into the manufacturing process. This approach is particularly important for effervescent formulations because these products are highly sensitive to moisture, environmental conditions, and process variations. Polyethylene Glycol (PEG) 3350 effervescent powder, widely used as an osmotic laxative, requires careful control of raw materials, blending, granulation, drying, packaging, and storage to maintain its efficacy, stability, and patient acceptability. This review discusses current advances in process validation strategies for PEG 3350 effervescent powder, with particular emphasis on critical process parameters (CPPs), critical quality attributes (CQAs), risk assessment, process analytical technology (PAT), Quality by Design (QbD), and continuous process verification. The article also summarizes recent regulatory expectations from international agencies, including the US FDA, ICH, EMA, and WHO, highlighting their role in ensuring robust pharmaceutical manufacturing. Furthermore, challenges associated with moisture-sensitive effervescent formulations and future opportunities involving artificial intelligence, digital manufacturing, and real-time monitoring are explored. Overall, this review provides a comprehensive understanding of modern process validation approaches that support the consistent production of safe, effective, and high-quality PEG 3350 effervescent powder.
KEYWORDS
Pharmaceutical process validation plays a fundamental role in ensuring the consistent production of safe, effective, and high-quality medicines. This review has highlighted the importance of adopting a lifecycle-based validation strategy for PEG 3350 effervescent powder by integrating scientific process understanding, Quality by Design (QbD), Quality Risk Management (ICH Q9), and continuous process verification.The discussion emphasised the significance of controlling Critical Process Parameters (CPPs) and monitoring Critical Quality Attributes (CQAs), particularly for moisture-sensitive formulations. Sequential Fluidized Bed Drying followed by Vacuum Tray Drying was identified as an effective moisture reduction strategy that improves product stability while preserving the physical characteristics of PEG 3350. In addition, analytical evaluation, environmental control, and comprehensive regulatory compliance were shown to be essential for maintaining consistent product quality throughout manufacturing.From an industrial perspective, robust process validation enhances manufacturing efficiency, minimises batch-to-batch variability, reduces product rejection, and supports compliance with international regulatory expectations established by the FDA, EMA, WHO, ICH, USP, and BP. The adoption of advanced technologies such as Process Analytical Technology, Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, digital manufacturing, and continuous manufacturing is further transforming pharmaceutical production into a more intelligent, predictive, and quality-focused process.Despite these advancements, challenges including moisture sensitivity, commercial scale-up, implementation of continuous validation, and integration of advanced digital technologies remain important areas for future investigation. Continued research should focus on developing smarter process control strategies, AI-assisted predictive models, sustainable manufacturing practices, and advanced real-time monitoring systems to further strengthen process robustness.
1. US Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for Industry: Process Validation: General Principles and Practices. Silver Spring (MD): US Food and Drug Administration; 2011. 2. International Council for Harmonisation (ICH). ICH Q8(R2): Pharmaceutical Development. Geneva: ICH; 2009. 3. International Council for Harmonisation (ICH). ICH Q9(R1): Quality Risk Management. Geneva: ICH; 2023. 4. International Council for Harmonisation (ICH). ICH Q10: Pharmaceutical Quality System. Geneva: ICH; 2009. 5. International Council for Harmonisation (ICH). ICH Q7: Good Manufacturing Practice Guide for Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients. Geneva: ICH; 2016. 6. World Health Organization. WHO Technical Report Series No. 1025. Annex 4: Good Manufacturing Practices for Pharmaceutical Products. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2020. 7. European Medicines Agency. ICH Q8, Q9 and Q10 Questions and Answers (R5). Amsterdam: European Medicines Agency; 2025. 8. United States Pharmacopeia. USP–NF. Rockville (MD): United States Pharmacopeial Convention; 2024. 9. British Pharmacopoeia Commission. British Pharmacopoeia 2025. London: TSO; 2025. 10. Rowe RC, Sheskey PJ, Quinn ME. Handbook of Pharmaceutical Excipients. 9th ed. London: Pharmaceutical Press; 2020.
Publication Date
8/11/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
2
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...