Crossref DOIMemberCiteFactoropen accessissn
SJIF Impact Factor 8.659 | ISSN: 2582-3930
IJSREM Logo

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management

(Gateway to Global Scholars - An International, Scholarly, Multi-Disciplinary, Open Access Journal)

Peer-Reviewed Journal Designed to Meet UGC's Quality Parameters

HomeCurrent IssuePast IssuesPay OnlineConferencesEditorial BoardAbout UsContact Us
IJSREM

Loading article...

Follow Us

  • Google Scholar
  • ResearchGate
  • Academia.edu
  • Mendeley
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram

Journal Policies

  • Peer Review Policy
  • Publication Ethics
  • Copyright Infringement
  • Refund & Cancellation Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Journal Identifiers & Licenses

  • ISSN Verified: 2582-3930ISSN Verified: 2582-3930
  • Crossref DOI: 10.55041Crossref DOI: 10.55041
  • SJIF Ranking: 08.659SJIF Ranking: 08.659
  • Licensed under CC BY 4.0Licensed under CC BY 4.0
  • ISO Certification: 9001:2015ISO Certification: 9001:2015
  • Indexed & Cited In: Google ScholarIndexed & Cited In: Google Scholar

Contact Us

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management (IJSREM)

#62/1, New No 7, 1st Cross, 2nd Main, Ganganagar, R T Nagar, Bangalore North, Bangalore, Karnataka, India – 560032
[email protected]+91 93911 67991
logos
logos
Working Hours

Mon – Sat: 9:00 AM – 6:00 PM

Sunday: 10:00 AM – 4:00 PM

+91 93911 67991

© 2026 IJSREM – International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management. This is an open-access journal. Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
ArticlePeer ReviewedOpen AccessPlagiarism Passed
Paper ID:IJSREM66686

PROCESS VALIDATION STRATEGIES FOR PEG 3350 EFFERVESCENT POWDER: CURRENT ADVANCES, CRITICAL PROCESS PARAMETERS, AND REGULATORY PERSPECTIVES

Stream/Area:

-

Subject:

-

Paper ID:

IJSREM66686

Volume:

10 |

8 |

Aug 2026

Pages:

1-21

Publication Frequency:

Monthly (12 issues per year)

DOI
Digital Object Identifier
10.55041/IJSREM66686

License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Share this article:

Authors

ARD

Anushka Rajendra Deshmukh

Quality Assurance

JMCT Institute of Pharmacy, Wadala road, Nashik- 422006

Download Author Certificate
PPTN

Prof. Pravin Tryambak Netkar

Quality Assurance

JMCT Institute of Pharmacy, Wadala road, Nashik- 422006

Download Co-Author Certificate
DSAA

Dr. Shahzad Ahmed A.R.

Quality Assurance

JMCT Institute of Pharmacy, Wadala road, Nashik- 422006

Download Co-Author Certificate

Author Services & Downloads

Full ArticlesAcceptance Certificate

Abstract

Process validation is a fundamental element of pharmaceutical quality assurance that ensures manufacturing processes consistently produce products meeting predefined quality standards. In recent years, regulatory agencies have shifted from traditional end-product testing toward a lifecycle-based approach that focuses on building quality into the manufacturing process. This approach is particularly important for effervescent formulations because these products are highly sensitive to moisture, environmental conditions, and process variations. Polyethylene Glycol (PEG) 3350 effervescent powder, widely used as an osmotic laxative, requires careful control of raw materials, blending, granulation, drying, packaging, and storage to maintain its efficacy, stability, and patient acceptability. This review discusses current advances in process validation strategies for PEG 3350 effervescent powder, with particular emphasis on critical process parameters (CPPs), critical quality attributes (CQAs), risk assessment, process analytical technology (PAT), Quality by Design (QbD), and continuous process verification. The article also summarizes recent regulatory expectations from international agencies, including the US FDA, ICH, EMA, and WHO, highlighting their role in ensuring robust pharmaceutical manufacturing. Furthermore, challenges associated with moisture-sensitive effervescent formulations and future opportunities involving artificial intelligence, digital manufacturing, and real-time monitoring are explored. Overall, this review provides a comprehensive understanding of modern process validation approaches that support the consistent production of safe, effective, and high-quality PEG 3350 effervescent powder.

KEYWORDS

Process Validation PEG 3350 Effervescent Powder Critical Process Parameters Quality by Design Process Analytical Technology Continuous Process Verification Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Regulatory Guidelines Quality Assurance

Cite This Article

Anushka Rajendra Deshmukh, Prof. Pravin Tryambak Netkar, Dr. Shahzad Ahmed A.R., "PROCESS VALIDATION STRATEGIES FOR PEG 3350 EFFERVESCENT POWDER: CURRENT ADVANCES, CRITICAL PROCESS PARAMETERS, AND REGULATORY PERSPECTIVES," International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 10, no. 8, pp. 1-21, Aug 2026. https://doi.org/10.55041/IJSREM66686

Full Article/Conclusion

Pharmaceutical process validation plays a fundamental role in ensuring the consistent production of safe, effective, and high-quality medicines. This review has highlighted the importance of adopting a lifecycle-based validation strategy for PEG 3350 effervescent powder by integrating scientific process understanding, Quality by Design (QbD), Quality Risk Management (ICH Q9), and continuous process verification.The discussion emphasised the significance of controlling Critical Process Parameters (CPPs) and monitoring Critical Quality Attributes (CQAs), particularly for moisture-sensitive formulations. Sequential Fluidized Bed Drying followed by Vacuum Tray Drying was identified as an effective moisture reduction strategy that improves product stability while preserving the physical characteristics of PEG 3350. In addition, analytical evaluation, environmental control, and comprehensive regulatory compliance were shown to be essential for maintaining consistent product quality throughout manufacturing.From an industrial perspective, robust process validation enhances manufacturing efficiency, minimises batch-to-batch variability, reduces product rejection, and supports compliance with international regulatory expectations established by the FDA, EMA, WHO, ICH, USP, and BP. The adoption of advanced technologies such as Process Analytical Technology, Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, digital manufacturing, and continuous manufacturing is further transforming pharmaceutical production into a more intelligent, predictive, and quality-focused process.Despite these advancements, challenges including moisture sensitivity, commercial scale-up, implementation of continuous validation, and integration of advanced digital technologies remain important areas for future investigation. Continued research should focus on developing smarter process control strategies, AI-assisted predictive models, sustainable manufacturing practices, and advanced real-time monitoring systems to further strengthen process robustness.

References

1. US Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for Industry: Process Validation: General Principles and Practices. Silver Spring (MD): US Food and Drug Administration; 2011. 2. International Council for Harmonisation (ICH). ICH Q8(R2): Pharmaceutical Development. Geneva: ICH; 2009. 3. International Council for Harmonisation (ICH). ICH Q9(R1): Quality Risk Management. Geneva: ICH; 2023. 4. International Council for Harmonisation (ICH). ICH Q10: Pharmaceutical Quality System. Geneva: ICH; 2009. 5. International Council for Harmonisation (ICH). ICH Q7: Good Manufacturing Practice Guide for Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients. Geneva: ICH; 2016. 6. World Health Organization. WHO Technical Report Series No. 1025. Annex 4: Good Manufacturing Practices for Pharmaceutical Products. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2020. 7. European Medicines Agency. ICH Q8, Q9 and Q10 Questions and Answers (R5). Amsterdam: European Medicines Agency; 2025. 8. United States Pharmacopeia. USP–NF. Rockville (MD): United States Pharmacopeial Convention; 2024. 9. British Pharmacopoeia Commission. British Pharmacopoeia 2025. London: TSO; 2025. 10. Rowe RC, Sheskey PJ, Quinn ME. Handbook of Pharmaceutical Excipients. 9th ed. London: Pharmaceutical Press; 2020.

Editorial & Review Transparency

Publication Date

8/11/2026

Peer Review Type

Double-Blind Peer Review

Review Rounds: 2

Documents

Review Report (Confidential)
Copyright Form (Office)

Article Metrics & Impact

Article Views

0

Total views since publication

PDF Downloads

2

Total downloads since publication

Geographic Reach

5

Indexing, Archiving & Preservation

Google Scholar
Academia
ResearchGate
Crossref
SSRN
Semantic Scholar
Thomson Reuters
WorldCat
Mendeley
OpenAlex
EBSCO
Zenodo

Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.

Ethics, Compliance & Transparency

Plagiarism Screening

This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.

Funding Information

No funding information available for this research.

Similar & Recommended Articles

Similar Articles by Topic

Related research in the same subject area

Loading similar articles...