Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
10.55041/IJSREM.FCE006
Volume:
10 |
6 |
Jun 2026
Pages:
1-14
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Department of Civil Engineering
FET, JAIN (Deemed-to-be University), Bengaluru-562112, Karnataka, India
Department of Civil Engineering
FET, JAIN (Deemed-to-be University), Bengaluru-562112, Karnataka, India
As global security challenges evolve, engineering structural systems capable of withstanding extreme loading has become a critical priority. This research investigates the blast-resistant design and structural analysis of an Industrial Processing Plant building, utilizing the Equivalent Static Analysis (ESA) method as a practical alternative to computationally intensive dynamic simulations. While blast events are inherently dynamic and occur at high strain rates,this study focuses on developing a simplified, conservative design framework suitable for industrial engineering applications. The study began with the development of a comprehensive 3D analytical model using STAAD.Pro, incorporating a diverse range of load cases including dead, live, wind, earthquake (per ASCE 7-16), and thermal loads. A core focus of the research was the comparative performance analysis between Reinforced Concrete (RCC) and Structural Steel frames under identical blast scenarios. The methodology involved converting blast pressure-time histories into Equivalent Static Pressures using Dynamic Load Factors (DLF) to account for peak overpressure and impulse parameters. A significant portion of this project is dedicated to the quantitative verification of structural integrity for vulnerable components. Detailed analytical calculations were performed which are often the first elements to sustain blast impact. These elements were rigorously evaluated through: i. Bending Checks: Assessing flexural capacity to ensure the members can absorb energy through controlled deformation without catastrophic failure. ii. Shear Checks: Verifying resistance against high-velocity diagonal tension to prevent brittle shear "snapping" at the supports. iii. Crack Control Analysis: Evaluating post-event serviceability and the extent of material degradation to determine the feasibility of structural repair. Furthermore, the research explores mitigation strategies to enhance ductility, such as the use of Ultra-High Performance Fiber-Reinforced Concrete (UHPFRC) and advanced seismic style detailing to prevent spalling and progressive collapse. The results demonstrate that the ESA method, when coupled with rigorous bending and shear verification, provides a reliable and computationally efficient approach for ensuring the safety of industrial facilities. This work provides structural engineers with a validated roadmap for designing blast-resilient infrastructure that balances safety, cost, and analytical complexity.
KEYWORDS
The overall study confirms that both RCC and structural steel systems can be effectively designed to resist blast loads when appropriate detailing and mitigation strategies are incorporated. RCC structures provide superior shielding and stiffness, while structural steel systems offer enhanced ductility and post-blast survivability. Among the mitigation techniques studied, UHPFRC integration and ductile confinement detailing provided the most significant improvement in blast resistance. The study also validates the suitability of Equivalent Static Analysis as a simplified yet reliable design procedure for blast-resistant industrial processing plant buildings. The results obtained from this research contribute toward the development of safer and more resilient industrial infrastructure capable of withstanding accidental explosion events while maintaining structural integrity and occupant safety.
[1] Bhattacharyya, S. (2019). Structural Design of Industrial Buildings. McGraw-Hill Education. [2] Troxell, G.E., Davis, H.E., & Kelly, J.W. (2018). Structural Analysis and Design of Industrial Structures. Wiley. [3] American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC). (2017). Steel Construction Manual, 15th Edition, Chicago. [4] ASCE 7-22. (2022). Minimum Design Loads and Associated Criteria for Buildings and Other Structures. American Society of Civil Engineers. [5] IS 875 (Parts 1–5). Code of Practice for Design Loads (Other Than Earthquake) for Buildings and Structures. Bureau of Indian Standards. [6] IS 1893 (Part 1). Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures. Bureau of Indian Standards. [7] NFPA 30 (2021). Flammable and Combustible Liquids Code. National Fire Protection Association. [8] CCPS (2018). Guidelines for Facility Siting and Layout. Wiley-AIChE. [9] CCPS (2019). Guidelines for Fire Protection in Chemical, Petrochemical, and Hydrocarbon Processing Facilities. [10] Smith, R., & Zappe, R. (2017). Chemical Process Equipment: Selection and Design. Elsevier.
Publication Date
6/18/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
3
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...