Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM64094
Volume:
10 |
5 |
May 2026
Pages:
1-4
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Department of Master in Computer Application
Progressive Education Society's Modern College of Engineering
Department of Master in Computer Application
Progressive Education Society's Modern College of Engineering
The artificial intelligence landscape is undergoing a foundational paradigm shift: transitioning from solitary, single- prompt Large Language Models (LLMs) to stateful, collaborative Multi-Agent Systems (MAS). While single-agent assistants are constrained by finite context windows, reasoning bottlenecks, and single-perspective blind spots, multi-agent orchestration systems divide complex tasks into subproblems assigned to specialized, autonomous roles. This paper provides a comprehensive survey of this transition. We first establish a taxonomy of AI agency, tracing the evolution from passive automaticity to fully au- tonomous systems. We then analyze the core dimensions of MAS design—Structure, Interaction, and Evolution—and detail the specialized roles (Worker, Service, Support) necessary for com- plex orchestration. Furthermore, we present a comparative anal- ysis of leading open-source orchestration frameworks, including LangGraph, CrewAI, AutoGen, and MetaGPT, contrasting their design philosophies, state-management models, and recovery guarantees. Finally, as autonomy increases, so does system vulner- ability; thus, we examine the threat of cascading hallucinations introduced by faulty agents and evaluate resilience topologies (Linear, Flat, Hierarchical) alongside recovery mechanisms like Challenger and Inspector patterns. This survey equips developers and researchers with the architectural knowledge required to design robust, enterprise-grade multi-agent collectives.
KEYWORDS
The transition from solitary AI assistants to orchestrated, autonomous multi-agent systems represents the future of digi- tal labor. By decomposing complex workflows into specialized roles—Worker, Service, and Support agents—MAS architec- tures circumvent the reasoning and context limitations of single LLMs. However, this transition shifts the engineering burden from prompt optimization to systems architecture. Developers must carefully choose their orchestration frameworks: leveraging LangGraph for deterministic, auditable state machines, Cre- wAI for rapid role-based deployments, or MetaGPT for strict, SOP-driven generation. Crucially, as these systems gain Level 4 autonomy, the implementation of resilient topologies (such as hierarchical structures) and validation layers (Inspector agents) is not optional; it is a fundamental requirement to prevent cascading hallucinations and ensure enterprise-grade safety.
[1] M. Zhu, M. Li, M. Cui, et al., “A Survey on Large Language Model- based Multi-Agent Systems: Paradigms, Applications, and Challenges,” TechRxiv, Feb. 2026. [2] Anonymous Authors, “The Orchestration of Multi-Agent Systems: Ar- chitectures, Protocols, and Enterprise Adoption,” arXiv preprint, Jan. 2026. [3] Anonymous Authors, “LLM-Based Multi-Agent Orchestration: A Sur- vey of Frameworks, Communication Protocols, and Emerging Patterns,” Preprints.org, Apr. 2026. [4] Anonymous Authors, “On the Resilience of LLM-Based Multi-Agent Collaboration with Faulty Agents,” OpenReview, 2026. [5] Anonymous Authors, “AI Agents in Service Experience: Towards Au- tonomous and Conscious Agency,” Journal of Service Management, Emerald Publishing, Feb. 2026. [6] Q. Wu, G. Bansal, J. Zhang, et al., “AutoGen: Enabling Next-Gen LLM Applications via Multi-Agent Conversation Framework,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.08155, 2023. [7] S. Hong, M. Zhuge, J. Chen, et al., “MetaGPT: Meta Program- ming for Multi-Agent Collaborative Framework,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.00352, 2023. [8] S. Yao, J. Zhao, D. Yu, et al., “ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Models,” International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), 2023. [9] LangChain AI, “LangGraph: Stateful, Multi-Actor LLM Appli- cations,” LangChain Documentation, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://python.langchain.com/docs/langgraph [10] CrewAI, “CrewAI Framework Documentation: Role-playing au- tonomous AI agents,” CrewAI Official Documentation, 2024.
Publication Date
5/26/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
1
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
4
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...