Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM27978
Volume:
8 |
1 |
Jan 2024
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a common but not well known critical disease condition that is linked to a high death rate. The fact that chest x-rays for ARDS are not always interpreted the same way is a big reason why it is not recognised more often. We wanted to teach a deep convolutional neural network (CNN) how to find signs of ARDS on chest x-rays. CNNs were first trained on 595,506 chest x-rays from two places to find common chest results like opacity and effusion. They were then trained on 8072 chest x-rays that had been marked for ARDS by several doctors using different transfer learning methods. The best CNN was tried on chest x-rays from both an internal and external group. Six doctors, including a chest radiologist and intensive care medicine specialists, looked over a subset of the images. Four hospitals in the US provided chest x-ray statistics. A CNN was able to find ARDS in 1560 chest x-rays from 455 patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure, with an area under the receiver operator characteristics curve (AUROC) of 0.92% (95% CI 0.89% to 0.94%). Its AUROC was 0.933 (95% CI 0.888–0.996) for the subset of 413 pictures looked at by at least six doctors, and its sensitivity was 83% (95% CI 74.0% to 91.1%). The AUROC was 0.93% (0.92–0.95%) when images marked as “equivocal” were taken out of the analysis. Chest x-rays can be used to train a CNN to perform as well as a doctor at finding ARDS. More study is needed to see how well these algorithms work for finding ARDS patients in real time so that evidence-based care is followed or to help with current ARDS research.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
12/31/45299
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
2
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...