Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM16517
Volume:
6 |
10 |
Oct 2022
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Moment resisting frames are commonly used as the dominant mode of lateral resisting system in seismic regions for a long time. The poor performance of Ordinary Moment Resisting Frame (OMRF) in past earthquakes suggested special design and detailing to warrant a ductile behavior in seismic zones of high earthquake (zone III, IV & V). Thus when a large earthquake occurs, Special Moment Resisting Frame (SMRF) which is speciallydetailed with a response reduction factor, R = 5 is expected to have superior ductility. The response reduction factor of 5 in SMRF reduces the design base shear and in such a case these building rely greatly on their ductile performance. To ensure ductile performance, this type of frames shall be detailed in a special manner recommended by IS 13920. The objectiveof the present study is to evaluate the R factors of these frames from their nonlinear base shear versus roof displacement curves (pushover curves) and to check its adequacy comparedto code recommended R value. The accurate estimation of strength and displacement capacity of nonlinear pushover curves requires the confinement modelling of concrete as per an accepted confinement model. A review of various concrete confinement models is carried out to select appropriate concrete confinement model. It is found that modified Kent and Park model is an appropriate model and it is incorporated in the modelling of nonlinearity in concrete sections. The frames with number of storeys 2, 4, 8, and 12 (with four bays) are designed and detailed as SMRF and OMRF as per IS 1893 (2002). The pushover curves of each SMRF and OMRF frames are generated and converted to a bilinear format to calculate the behavior factors. The response reduction factors obtained show in general that both the OMRF and SMRF frames, failed to achieve the respective target values of response reduction factors recommended by IS 1893 (2002) marginally. The components of response reduction factors such as over-strength and ductility factors also evaluated for all the SMRF and OMRF frames. It was also found that shorter frames exhibit higher R factors and as the height of the frames increases the R factors decreases.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
5/9/2022
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
1
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...