Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
10.55041/IJSREM35239
Volume:
8 |
5 |
May 2024
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Adversarial attacks pose a substantial risk to the security and dependability of machine learning (ML) models. These attacks entail creating harmful inputs, known as adversarial instances, which can lead models to provide inaccurate predictions. This article offers a thorough examination of adversarial assaults in machine learning, including their many forms, techniques of generation, current research, and potential future research areas. We analyze well-known attack techniques such as FGSM, DeepFool, Carlini & Wagner (C&W), and ZOO, emphasizing their advantages and constraints. The research limitations we have identified relate to the lack of comprehensive comparative analysis and the absence of a structured decision-making framework for offensive technique selection. In addition, we investigate the research obstacles related to adversarial variety, dynamic assault environments, the capacity to transfer knowledge across different domains, and the assessment of resilience in real-world scenarios. The paper highlights the need for investigating adversarial assaults to improve the resilience of models, enhance security measures, guide decision-making, stimulate innovation, and encourage responsible development of AI. In conclusion, we suggest potential areas for future study, such as the creation of improved defensive mechanisms, robust modeling tools, and the incorporation of multidisciplinary approaches.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
12/31/45443
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
2
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...