Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
10.55041/IJSREM25162
Volume:
7 |
8 |
Aug 2023
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
In the context of the rapid expansion of computer networks and the increasing reliance on digital communication, ensuring the security and integrity of network systems has become a paramount concern. Detecting network threats play a vital role in safeguarding networks by identifying potential malicious activities and unauthorized access attempts. In this research paper, we present a comprehensive study that explores the efficacy of different machine learning classifiers for network threat detection. The study utilizes a publicly available dataset containing network traffic data, encompassing various network protocols and attack. The dataset is pre-processed to convert categorical variables into numerical form using one-hot encoding. Four popular classifiers are employed in this study: Support Vector Machine (SVM), Decision Tree Classifier (DTC), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), and Bernoulli Naive Bayes (BNB). The classifiers are trained on the pre-processed training data, and their performance is evaluated using accuracy metrics, classification reports, and confusion matrices. Results offer insightful information on the weaknesses and weaknesses of each classifier for detecting network anomaly. The findings demonstrate that the DTC classifier exhibits high accuracy and robustness in detecting network anomalies. The KNN classifier also achieves competitive results but may suffer from scalability issues with large datasets. The SVM classifier demonstrates satisfactory performance, while the BNB classifier, which converts numeric features to binary form, exhibits relatively lower accuracy.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
10/7/2023
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
4
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...