Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM44645
Volume:
9 |
4 |
Apr 2025
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
In the domain of power quality enhancement, both conventional and dual compensation strategies have been widely employed in Unified Power Quality Conditioners (C-UPQC and D-UPQC). However, their comparative analysis often lacks depth, particularly under varying grid conditions. This study introduces an advanced approach by extending the scope to a Multi-UPQC configuration, which integrates multiple compensation units to operate in coordination. The paper establishes small-signal models in the dq-axis for both conventional, dual, and multi-UPQC systems, while accounting for the effects of grid impedance and phase-locked loop (PLL) dynamics. A comprehensive performance analysis is conducted under both steady-state and dynamic scenarios, including abrupt changes in grid voltage and load conditions. The results reveal that the D-UPQC demonstrates superior dynamic response under transient conditions, whereas the C-UPQC and D-UPQC show varying capabilities in harmonic suppression. Notably, the impact of grid impedance on load voltage quality is more pronounced in the C-UPQC, whereas the Multi-UPQC system effectively overcomes this limitation by distributing the compensation effort across multiple nodes. This collaborative compensation enhances reliability, expands coverage area, and improves both voltage regulation and harmonic mitigation. The study’s insights offer valuable guidance in selecting the most suitable compensation strategy for specific grid applications. Experimental validations confirm the accuracy of the proposed comparative framework and the superior adaptability of the Multi-UPQC system.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
4/16/2025
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
1
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...