Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM35605
Volume:
8 |
6 |
Jun 2024
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
In recent years, the Internet of Things (IoT) has undergone tremendous change, allowing people to automate mundane, everyday activities. Connecting several types of physical devices with distinct functions allows for this to be accomplished. In order to enhance intrusion detection systems, machine learning has emerged as the crucial option. As the Internet has grown in popularity and the number of suspicious activities or intrusions has accelerated, research into network intrusion detection systems (NIDS) has emerged as a pressing concern in the field of information and network security. By using a classification method, intrusion detection systems (IDS) can distinguish between normal and abnormal incoming network traffic, which is represented as a feature vector. This helps in the detection of intrusions that violate a computer network’s security policies and mechanisms and compromise CIA (confidentiality, integrity, and availability). It has been noted that classification performance is negatively impacted by feature vectors with large dimensionality in practice. A novel hybrid feature selection strategy was developed to lower the dimensionality while maintaining performance. Its efficacy was evaluated on the KDD Cup’99 dataset using the classifiers Naive Bayes and C4.5. Based on the aforementioned dataset and classifiers, two sets of experiments were carried out using the full feature set and reduced feature sets obtained using four popular feature selection methods: Correlation-based Feature Selection (CFS), Consistency-based Feature Selection (CON), Information Gain (IG), Gain Ratio (GR), and the proposed method. Classifier Naıve Bayes achieved a classification accuracy of 97.5% in the first trial, whereas C4.5 achieved 99.8%. Using the IG approach, the classifiers’ greatest performance (accuracy) was 99.1 and 99.8 percent in the second set of testing.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
6/5/2024
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
1
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...