Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
10.55041/IJSREM13094
Volume:
6 |
5 |
May 2022
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
This study summarized comparative design and analysis of RCC T-Beam Bridge superstructure for Different Codes i.e., Indian Road Congress (IRC) codes and American Association of State Highway Transportation Officials (AASHTO) Specification Load Combinations for varying span length. The several codes are used to design the bridges. IRC 21-2000 used for designing bridges by working stress method (WSM), also IRC: 112-2011 introduced by Indian Road Congress for RCC and Pre- Stressed bridges by limit state method (LSM). Both the codes have different guidelines and procedure for design of bridges. This study based on IRC 112-2011 (LSM) and IRC: 6- 2017 is used for load considerations. In which this analysis depends on the analytical modelling by Finite Element Method (FEM) for in STAAD-Pro software and comparing the structural parameter Bending moment, Shear Force, Deflection and Area of Reinforcement for different girder span length 16M, 20M, 24M as per the IRC and AASHTO code. Class A & Class 70R consider from IRC 6-2017 and HS93 is the vehicular loading consider from AASHTO. Form the analysis understanding suitability design technique and the behavior of two-lane carriage way width of T- Beam bridge superstructure under different loading condition and by using different code and comparing the result, conclusions will be made that up to what extents similarities between both standards.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
12/4/2022
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
1
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...