Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM46104
Volume:
9 |
4 |
Apr 2025
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
A field experiment was carried out during the 2022-23 and 2023-24 kharif and rabi seasons at Gram Dharavara, District Dhar. The goal was to understand how different preceding kharif crops and fertilizer management affect the growth, yield, nutrient uptake, and overall economic benefits of the following wheat crop (Triticum aestivum L.). The experiment was set up using a split plot design. The main plots included four different kharif crops: greengram (Vigna radiata), sesame (Sesamum indicum), pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum), and fodder sorghum (Sorghum bicolor). For the subplots, five different fertilizer treatments were tested: 100%, 75%, and 50% of the recommended dose of fertilizers (RDF), along with combinations of 75% and 50% RDF plus Azotobacter and PSB (phosphate solubilizing bacteria). Each treatment was repeated four times for accuracy. Wheat grown after greengram showed the best growth and yield. The wheat after greengram produced more grain (4.78 tons/ha) and straw (6.41 tons/ha) compared to other treatments. Among the fertilizer treatments, the 100% RDF resulted in the highest yields of both grain (4.60 tons/ha) and straw (6.20 tons/ha). Nutrient uptake by the wheat was also higher when grown after greengram and fertilized with 100% RDF. The greengram-wheat rotation, along with either 100% RDF or 75% RDF combined with Azotobacter + PSB, provided the best net profits and B:C ratio.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
4/27/2025
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
2
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...