Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM23565
Volume:
7 |
6 |
Jun 2023
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
The ability to recognize and extract sentiments from text data depends heavily on sentiment analysis. We use the dataset of IMDb movie reviews in this work to investigate the use of machine learning and deep learning approaches for sentiment analysis. Using the sentiments indicated in the text, the goal is to categorize movie reviews as positive or negative. To extract pertinent features for the machine learning methodology from the movie reviews, we use conventional feature engineering techniques. These characteristics include sentiment lexicons, bag-of-words, and n-grams. Train well-known machine learning algorithms on these features to create sentiment classifiers, including Naive Bayes, Support Vector Machines, and Logistic Regression. The deep learning approach, in contrast, uses the strength of neural networks to automatically uncover representations from unprocessed text data. We use a recurrent neural network (RNN), more specifically an LSTM network, to capture the sequential flow of language and extract contextual information from the movie reviews. The LSTM network is then used to learn sentiment representations on the IMDb movie review dataset. split the data into test and learn sets so we could compare different approaches. We use several metrics, including accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score, to evaluate the performance of the sentiment classifiers. We also compare the results of the machine learning and deep learning models to identify the benefits and drawbacks of each approach. Different machine learning models were analyzed for their performance, with Linear SVM coming out on top with an accuracy of 89.57%. Other top performers included Multinomial Naive Bayes, Linear SVM, and XGboost.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
6/13/2023
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
1
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...