Crossref DOIMemberCiteFactoropen accessissn
SJIF Impact Factor 8.659 | ISSN: 2582-3930
IJSREM Logo

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management

(Gateway to Global Scholars - An International, Scholarly, Multi-Disciplinary, Open Access Journal)

Peer-Reviewed Journal Designed to Meet UGC's Quality Parameters

HomeCurrent IssuePast IssuesPay OnlineConferencesEditorial BoardAbout UsContact Us
IJSREM

Loading article...

Follow Us

  • Google Scholar
  • ResearchGate
  • Academia.edu
  • Mendeley
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram

Journal Policies

  • Peer Review Policy
  • Publication Ethics
  • Copyright Infringement
  • Refund & Cancellation Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Journal Identifiers & Licenses

  • ISSN Verified: 2582-3930ISSN Verified: 2582-3930
  • Crossref DOI: 10.55041Crossref DOI: 10.55041
  • SJIF Ranking: 08.659SJIF Ranking: 08.659
  • Licensed under CC BY 4.0Licensed under CC BY 4.0
  • ISO Certification: 9001:2015ISO Certification: 9001:2015
  • Indexed & Cited In: Google ScholarIndexed & Cited In: Google Scholar

Contact Us

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management (IJSREM)

#62/1, New No 7, 1st Cross, 2nd Main, Ganganagar, R T Nagar, Bangalore North, Bangalore, Karnataka, India – 560032
[email protected]+91 93911 67991
logos
logos
Working Hours

Mon – Sat: 9:00 AM – 6:00 PM

Sunday: 10:00 AM – 4:00 PM

+91 93911 67991

© 2026 IJSREM – International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management. This is an open-access journal. Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
ArticlePeer ReviewedOpen AccessPlagiarism Passed
Paper ID:IJSREM48732

Evaluating Modern Android Frameworks: A Comparative Study of Flutter, Kotlin Multiplatform, Jetpack Compose, and React Native

Stream/Area:

-

Subject:

-

Paper ID:

IJSREM48732

Volume:

9 |

5 |

May 2025

Pages:

Publication Frequency:

Monthly (12 issues per year)

DOI
Digital Object Identifier
10.55041/IJSREM48732

License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Share this article:

Authors

RK

Ramesh Kumar

JA

Juhi Arya

Author Services & Downloads

Full Articles

Abstract

Selecting a correct mobile development framework is crucial for obtaining efficiency, maintainability, and performance for Android apps. This study presents a comparative analysis of four most popular Android frameworks: Flutter, Kotlin Multiplatform, Jetpack Compose, and React Native. Every framework offers a variety of strengths and trade-offs concerning performance, UI capabilities, platform integration, developer experience, and community support. Flutter, Google’s creation, is a UI toolkit that provides cross-platform development using a shared codebase through its Skia rendering engine-based highly customizable and fast UI. But its dependency on Dart and non-native orientation can bring along integration issues. Kotlin Multiplatform, in contrast, supports code sharing while maintaining native UI development, thus being a good option for teams that value platform-specific experiences but minimize duplicated logic. Jetpack Compose, Google’s new declarative UI library for Android, enhances UI development with concise, reactive code but is only for Android, restricting its cross-platform capability. React Native, sponsored by Meta, supports cross-platform development with JavaScript and native-component bridge with balanced performance and development speed but at risk of performance bottlenecks due to its JavaScript-to-native interface. This book compares empirically these frameworks on parameters such as rendering speed, memory, development ease, and flexibility between platforms. Based on analysis of actual implementation scenarios, the study discusses the pros and cons of each framework and offers recommendations to developers, companies, and teams in selecting the optimal framework based on project requirements. The results indicate that the best option relies upon the level of complexity in projects, the skill level of the team, performance requirements, and long-term maintenance. The analysis is a guide for Android development framework choices by developers in the changing environment of Android development.

KEYWORDS

Android frameworks cross-platform performance UI rendering code reusability scalability developer productivity Flutter Jetpack Compose React Native Kotlin Multiplatform.

Cite This Article

Ramesh Kumar, Juhi Arya, "Evaluating Modern Android Frameworks: A Comparative Study of Flutter, Kotlin Multiplatform, Jetpack Compose, and React Native," International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 9, no. 5, May 2025. https://doi.org/10.55041/IJSREM48732

Full Article/Conclusion

References

Editorial & Review Transparency

Publication Date

5/26/2025

Peer Review Type

Double-Blind Peer Review

Review Rounds: 2

Documents

Review Report (Confidential)
Copyright Form (Office)

Article Metrics & Impact

Article Views

0

Total views since publication

PDF Downloads

10

Total downloads since publication

Geographic Reach

5

Indexing, Archiving & Preservation

Google Scholar
Academia
ResearchGate
Crossref
SSRN
Semantic Scholar
Thomson Reuters
WorldCat
Mendeley
OpenAlex
EBSCO
Zenodo

Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.

Ethics, Compliance & Transparency

Plagiarism Screening

This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.

Funding Information

No funding information available for this research.

Similar & Recommended Articles

Similar Articles by Topic

Related research in the same subject area

Loading similar articles...