EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF FERROCK MATERIAL SUBSTITUTE TO CEMENT CONCRETE

Concrete, after water across the world, the second most broadly utilized material involving 8-10% of all yields of CO2, is predominantly because of cement. This project ultimately aims to determine the potential use of Ferrock as an exceptional replacement for cement in concrete compared with other alternative alternatives. It is a steel-based restraining compound used to form a carbon-negative structure substance utilizing waste material absorbents. The iron residue (an iron business loss) that would end in sites somehow alongside small quantities of limestone, Metakaolin, and fly ash is being used to make this an efficient substance. Our research focuses unexpectedly on their commitment to carbon dioxide contamination, energy use, water use, the ecologic impact of ordinary Portland cement and Ferrock (limestone 8%, Metakaolin 12%, and fly ash 20%, and iron residue 60%). By subtitling concrete with Ferrock in fluctuating proportions of 5%, 10%, 15%, and 20% in solid, we attempt to find the ideal proportion of substitution, which, along with sustainability, would boost wanted outcomes for both (compressive and divided tensile). In all this proportion, the test result shows 10% is more efficient than others Here we use materials such as Metakaolin, limestone, fly-a along with iron dust for proper As per the available literature we know that the best possible proportion of ingredients is iron dust (60%), fly-ash (20%), Metakaolin (12%) and limestone (8%). Analysis (atomic Absorption spectroscopy) shows that fully cured samples contain Between 8 and 11% captured CO2 by weight. Ferrock is therefore’ ‘Carbon negative” unlike Portland cement, which during manufacture is the major source of CO2 and other air pollutants.