Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
10.55041/IJSREM31212
Volume:
8 |
4 |
Apr 2024
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
This research studies the impact of user perceptions on trust and acceptance of artificial intelligence in financial decision-making. A structured questionnaire was administered to capture user sentiments regarding challenges and opportunities associated with AI in finance. Statistical techniques that is ANOVA, paired sample t-tests, and the Tukey Honestly Significant Difference (HSD) test, were performed to explore the data and assess the significant differences in user attitudes. The results supported the alternative hypothesis, revealing that user perceptions significantly impact their trust and acceptance of AI-driven financial solutions. ANOVA analysis demonstrated varying levels of trust and acceptance among different user groups, while paired sample t-tests highlighted significant disparities in concerns about security and privacy, trust in AI, and satisfaction with transparency. Further, key findings suggest that users who perceive more challenges or fewer opportunities tend to have lower trust in AI for financial decisions. Moreover, key differences were found across different demographic groups that highlights the need for customer-focused methods in the development of AI. The implications for financial institutions underscore the importance of addressing user concerns to enhance trust and acceptance of AI-driven solutions. This study contributes to the growing body of research on AI adoption in finance and provides opportunities for future research into longitudinal trends and user-centric AI development strategies.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
12/31/45401
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
3
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...