Crossref DOIMemberCiteFactoropen accessissn
SJIF Impact Factor 8.659 | ISSN: 2582-3930
IJSREM Logo

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management

(Gateway to Global Scholars - An International, Scholarly, Multi-Disciplinary, Open Access Journal)

Peer-Reviewed Journal Designed to Meet UGC's Quality Parameters

HomeCurrent IssuePast IssuesPay OnlineConferencesEditorial BoardAbout UsContact Us
IJSREM

Loading article...

Follow Us

  • Google Scholar
  • ResearchGate
  • Academia.edu
  • Mendeley
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram

Journal Policies

  • Peer Review Policy
  • Publication Ethics
  • Copyright Infringement
  • Refund & Cancellation Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Journal Identifiers & Licenses

  • ISSN Verified: 2582-3930ISSN Verified: 2582-3930
  • Crossref DOI: 10.55041Crossref DOI: 10.55041
  • SJIF Ranking: 08.659SJIF Ranking: 08.659
  • Licensed under CC BY 4.0Licensed under CC BY 4.0
  • ISO Certification: 9001:2015ISO Certification: 9001:2015
  • Indexed & Cited In: Google ScholarIndexed & Cited In: Google Scholar

Contact Us

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management (IJSREM)

#62/1, New No 7, 1st Cross, 2nd Main, Ganganagar, R T Nagar, Bangalore North, Bangalore, Karnataka, India – 560032
[email protected]+91 93911 67991
logos
logos
Working Hours

Mon – Sat: 9:00 AM – 6:00 PM

Sunday: 10:00 AM – 4:00 PM

+91 93911 67991

© 2026 IJSREM – International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management. This is an open-access journal. Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
ArticlePeer ReviewedOpen AccessPlagiarism Passed
Paper ID:IJSREM44880

The Impact of Fintech on Traditional Lending Practices

Stream/Area:

-

Subject:

-

Paper ID:

IJSREM44880

Volume:

9 |

4 |

Apr 2025

Pages:

Publication Frequency:

Monthly (12 issues per year)

DOI
Digital Object Identifier
10.55041/IJSREM44880

License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Share this article:

Authors

AKP

Aditya Krishna Pillai

DJ

Dhruv Jan

DYKS

Dr. Yogesh Kumar Sharma

Author Services & Downloads

Full Articles

Abstract

The banking sector has witnessed a radical shift with the advent of Financial Technology (Fintech), especially in lending. Fintech lending has brought technology-backed solutions that have transformed traditional borrowing and lending models. Online lending platforms, peer-to-peer (P2P) lending, artificial intelligence (AI)-driven credit scoring, and blockchain-based loan processing have made credit more available, efficient, and inclusive. These innovations are especially helpful for small businesses and individuals who tend to find it difficult to get loans from traditional banks because of stringent credit screening tests, high documentation, and long approval periods. Financial institutions and banks have traditionally used conventional credit scoring models, which are based on factors such as credit history, stability of income, and availability of collateral. This has restricted access for low-credit-history or no-credit-history borrowers or borrowers with non-traditional income sources. Fintech companies have shaken this paradigm by utilizing big data analytics, machine learning, and alternative credit scoring methods. In contrast to focusing only on conventional financial statements, these sites evaluate varied data points like payment history, utility bills, online shopping activity, and even social media habits to determine the creditworthiness of a borrower. Such a paradigm has expanded credit availability, enabling a greater portion of people to avail loans that were hitherto beyond their reach. With the growing use of digital banking and mobile financial services, Fintech lending platforms have become popular because they are convenient, transparent, and fast. In contrast to traditional banks, where loan applications mean physical visits, paperwork, and lengthy processing, Fintech platforms enable borrowers to apply online, receive instant approval, and receive money within minutes. This speed has transformed consumer expectations in the lending business. Still, with these advancements came new issues with the rise of Fintech lending. Regulatory compliance, data privacy, cybersecurity threats, and financial stability have emerged as priority topics between policymakers and financial institutions. Besides, with increased research on Fintech, a vital gap in research is still critical. While most research tends to concentrate either on conventional banking or Fintech lending, there is no extensive comparative analysis of their efficiency, speed of approval, cost-effectiveness, and borrower accessibility. Recognizing the distinctions will provide insight in gauging Fintech’s long-term contribution to the financial ecosystem as well as how it may potentially reinforce or even replace established models of lending. In reorganizing lending culture, Fintech’s virtues as well as detriments have to be gauged and assessed carefully for its assurance as a path of sustainable economic expansion. This research paper will fill the current research gap by performing a comparative study between Fintech and conventional lending models based on secondary data sources, financial statements, and industry research. The research will analyze the efficiency, accessibility, and risk involved in both lending processes and give insights into the future direction of financial lending in the digital age.

KEYWORDS

Cite This Article

Aditya Krishna Pillai, Dhruv Jan, Dr. Yogesh Kumar Sharma, "The Impact of Fintech on Traditional Lending Practices," International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 9, no. 4, Apr 2025. https://doi.org/10.55041/IJSREM44880

Full Article/Conclusion

References

Editorial & Review Transparency

Publication Date

4/17/2025

Peer Review Type

Double-Blind Peer Review

Review Rounds: 2

Documents

Review Report (Confidential)
Copyright Form (Office)

Article Metrics & Impact

Article Views

0

Total views since publication

PDF Downloads

6

Total downloads since publication

Geographic Reach

5

Indexing, Archiving & Preservation

Google Scholar
Academia
ResearchGate
Crossref
SSRN
Semantic Scholar
Thomson Reuters
WorldCat
Mendeley
OpenAlex
EBSCO
Zenodo

Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.

Ethics, Compliance & Transparency

Plagiarism Screening

This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.

Funding Information

No funding information available for this research.

Similar & Recommended Articles

Similar Articles by Topic

Related research in the same subject area

Loading similar articles...