Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM56582
Volume:
10 |
2 |
Feb 2026
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Strength-oriented sports require specific physical characteristics that support efficient force production and movement execution. Variations in technical demands between Olympic weightlifting and powerlifting are known to influence anthropometric profiles of athletes (Garhammer, 1993; Keogh et al., 2006). The present investigation examined selected anthropometric measurements of inter-collegiate women weightlifters and powerlifters representing Mangalore University. A comparative research approach was adopted, involving sixty women athletes (30 weightlifters and 30 powerlifters) selected through purposive sampling. Standard anthropometric measurements including body dimensions, circumferences, and skinfold thickness were recorded using validated procedures (Ross & Marfell-Jones, 1991). Descriptive statistics and independent sample t-tests were applied to identify group differences at the 0.05 level of significance. The findings indicated no meaningful difference in standing height between the two groups. However, women weightlifters demonstrated significantly higher values in body weight, arm length, upper arm length, chest circumference, thigh circumference, calf circumference, and waist skinfold thickness. No statistically significant differences were observed in lower arm length, thigh skinfold thickness, or calf skinfold thickness. It was concluded that participation in Olympic weightlifting is associated with more pronounced anthropometric characteristics related to muscularity and leverage compared to powerlifting. The results emphasize the importance of anthropometric assessment for sport-specific training and athlete development among women strength athletes.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
2/14/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
3
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...