Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM53015
Volume:
9 |
10 |
Oct 2025
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the most common malignant tumours that attack the stomach lining. It is the second most common cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. As life expectancy increased by early diagnosis and dietary patterns changes. A number of diagnostic techniques, such as endoscopy analysis, CT scans, and histopathological imaging, are frequently employed to identify and assess GC. Despite their effectiveness, these techniques are frequently labour-intensive, time-consuming, and susceptible to inter-observer variability, all of which can compromise the consistency of the diagnosis. By facilitating automated feature extraction, selection, and classification from medical images, machine learning (ML) techniques have been developed recently to aid in the detection of gastric cancer. However, ML techniques often struggle with large, complex, and high-dimensional datasets and necessitate manual pre-processing. Deep Learning (DL) has become a more sophisticated and effective way to get around these restrictions. DL models, as opposed to conventional methods and classical ML techniques, offer higher accuracy, speed, and scalability by automatically learning hierarchical features from raw medical images. An extensive review of current DL-based methods for gastric cancer detection is provided in this paper. It looks at their architectural layouts, benefits, drawbacks, and performance comparisons. In order to enhance diagnostic accuracy and clinical application of DL-based systems, the review also identifies new research trends and makes recommendations for possible future paths.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
10/14/2025
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
7
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...