Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREMWP777
Volume:
9 |
5 |
May 2025
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Lung cancer is one of the significant reasons for death among India.This research article aims to assess and comparation the effectiveness of different machine learning methods in terms of accuracy.In order to evaluate the various classifiers’ degrees of accuracy, we took into account the various models that researchers have employed as well as their drawbacks and restrictions. We make that certain classifiers consume little accuracy and others have advanced accuracy but are not nearly at 100% after doing a thorough analysis of the literature. Therefore, we need to take a more calculated approach to correctly categorise lung cancer nodules. A comprehensive analysis of the literature showed that the little accuracy levels were caused by improper handling of the Dicom photos. We found that the collaborative classifier outpaced the other machine after a thorough analysis. As a result, after accounting for every classifier, we discovered that the main machine learning methods provided accuracy that was far below 90%. Additionally, we discovered that in instruction to recover the accuracy level and draw conclusions for the tumour diagnosis that accurately reflected our growing understanding of how lung cancer is classified, a better model had to be employed. Additionally, the revised model required to be relevant and trustworthy. Ultimately, a thorough investigation into the discipline of oncology was required to improve the classification of benevolent and malignant tumours.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
5/19/2025
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
2
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...