A Study on Barriers for Micro Housing

The absence of affordable housing and the sector’s large negative environmental impact present formidable obstacles. Although tiny homes have been suggested as a viable solution, little is known about customer behaviour and views towards them. This study used the Theory of Planned Behaviour as a theoretical framework to investigate demographic and socioeconomic characteristics, as well as reasons for and obstacles to living in tiny houses. Both an online poll and interviews were used to gather data. The findings revealed a statistically significant negative link between intention and present housing size and a statistically significant positive relationship between age and intention to live in a tiny house. Sustainability, cost-cutting, flexibility, minimalism, mobility, and a sense of community were the major drivers identified in this study. Legal limitations and a poor impression of minimalism were the main obstacles. (1) Almost 40% of individuals saw unfavourable effects from COVID-19, but those who were already interested in small houses saw statistically significant positive effects. (2) The majority of individuals seem to be interested in somewhat rural small houses, even though tiny houses placed in cities would be preferred to address the need for well-connected, high-density housing alternatives for young and old people and to solve the housing shortage. (3) Minimalism is both a driver and a deterrent for interest in tiny homes, but it may become more of a driver as society moves towards sustainability. (4) Financial limitations and a lack of available alternative housing options frequently fuel interest in tiny dwellings. The Theory of Planned Behaviour served as a reliable theoretical foundation for this study.