Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREMWP669
Volume:
9 |
5 |
May 2025
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
The emergence of deepfake content, which is propelled by a range of generative models such as GANs and autoencoders, severely undermines digital trust, security, and information integrity. Traditional unimodal detection—such that is focused exclusively on audio, video, or text—has quickly lost its effectiveness in the battle against advanced deepfakes capable of exploiting more than one modality. This study provides a comprehensive review of fusion-based multimodal deepfake detection techniques that categorizes them into early, late, hybrid, and attention-based fusion approaches. The authors provide an in-depth discussion of the benefits and limitations of these methodologies, demonstrate the feature extraction pipelines, and give a performance comparison on various sample datasets, including FakeAVCeleb, DFDC, and PolyGlotFake. In addition, the paper presents cross-modal difficulties, ethical considerations, and real-world implementation limitations. In total, the paper integrates recent literature findings to present the directions to future trends, technical barriers, and new research paths, and it calls attention to the need for generalizable, strong, and interpretable fusion models to deal with the more and more sophisticated threats from synthetic media.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
5/19/2025
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
2
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...