Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM55545
Volume:
9 |
12 |
Dec 2025
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
A paradigm shift toward inclusive, human-centered, and ethically grounded learning environments is marked by the quick development of Education 5.0. Education 5.0 incorporates artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning (ML), emotional intelligence, and sustainability to promote ethical governance and holistic learning, in contrast to Education 4.0, which focused on automation and digitization. Higher education still faces issues like unequal access, little personalization, and high dropout rates despite the extensive use of online and blended learning methods, which engage over 235 million students worldwide (UNESCO, 2021). In the meantime, adaptive learning, predictive analytics, and intelligent tutoring systems are expected to propel the AI-in-education market to USD 20 billion by 2027 (HolonIQ, 2022). However, integration remains fragmented and lacks a unified, learner-centric framework. With an emphasis on institutional scalability, ethical AI deployment, and personalization, this study suggests and assesses a comprehensive AI-ML architecture in line with Education 5.0 principles. The theoretical framework ensures a balanced synthesis of pedagogy, technology, and ethics by combining Constructivist Learning Theory, Connectivism, the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), and Diffusion of Innovations. The research promotes the development of flexible, sustainable, and equitable higher education institutions by connecting human values with technical innovation. In order to prepare students for Society 5.0, this study ultimately advances the idea of Education 5.0 as a human–technology partnership—improving academic achievement, emotional intelligence, and social responsibility.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
12/27/2025
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
4
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...