Barriers And Challenges of Sustainable Logistics in Automobile Industry using AHP Method

Study Background and Objectives The automobile industry is a significant contributor to global environmental concerns. Vehicle production, transportation, and end-of-life management all have substantial environmental footprints. Sustainable logistics practices offer a path towards a greener future for industry. However, implementing these practices faces numerous challenges. This study aims to investigate the barriers and challenges hindering the adoption of sustainable logistics practices within the automobile industry. The specific objectives are: · To identify the key barriers faced by automobile manufacturers and their logistics partners in implementing sustainable practices. · To analyse the impact of these barriers on the environmental performance of the industry’s logistics operations. · To develop recommendations for overcoming these barriers and promoting sustainable logistics practices within the automobile sector. Research Design This study employs a literature review methodology to analyze existing research on the barriers and challenges of sustainable logistics in the automobile industry. Relevant academic journals, conference proceedings, and industry reports are reviewed to identify key themes and insights. · Conduct a systematic and comprehensive review of relevant academic journals, industry reports, and government publications. · Utilize appropriate search engines and databases to identify relevant literature. · Analyse the collected data to identify key themes, trends, and research gaps. · Synthesize the findings to provide a comprehensive understanding of the barriers and challenges of sustainable logistics in the automobile industry. Major Findings The study reveals a growing consumer interest in the auto industry’s commitment to sustainability. While price, performance, and safety remain significant purchase factors, a significant portion of consumers consider a car manufacturer’s environmental practices when deciding. However, a k