Crossref DOIMemberCiteFactoropen accessissn
SJIF Impact Factor 8.659 | ISSN: 2582-3930
IJSREM Logo

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management

(Gateway to Global Scholars - An International, Scholarly, Multi-Disciplinary, Open Access Journal)

Peer-Reviewed Journal Designed to Meet UGC's Quality Parameters

HomeCurrent IssuePast IssuesPay OnlineConferencesEditorial BoardAbout UsContact Us
IJSREM

Loading article...

Follow Us

  • Google Scholar
  • ResearchGate
  • Academia.edu
  • Mendeley
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram

Journal Policies

  • Peer Review Policy
  • Publication Ethics
  • Copyright Infringement
  • Refund & Cancellation Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Journal Identifiers & Licenses

  • ISSN Verified: 2582-3930ISSN Verified: 2582-3930
  • Crossref DOI: 10.55041Crossref DOI: 10.55041
  • SJIF Ranking: 08.659SJIF Ranking: 08.659
  • Licensed under CC BY 4.0Licensed under CC BY 4.0
  • ISO Certification: 9001:2015ISO Certification: 9001:2015
  • Indexed & Cited In: Google ScholarIndexed & Cited In: Google Scholar

Contact Us

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management (IJSREM)

#62/1, New No 7, 1st Cross, 2nd Main, Ganganagar, R T Nagar, Bangalore North, Bangalore, Karnataka, India – 560032
[email protected]+91 93911 67991
logos
logos
Working Hours

Mon – Sat: 9:00 AM – 6:00 PM

Sunday: 10:00 AM – 4:00 PM

+91 93911 67991

© 2026 IJSREM – International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management. This is an open-access journal. Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
ArticlePeer ReviewedOpen AccessPlagiarism Passed
Paper ID:IJSREM48086

Challenges in Standardizing Explainable AI Metrics for Ambiguous Learning Models in Cloud Infrastructure

Stream/Area:

-

Subject:

-

Paper ID:

IJSREM48086

Volume:

9 |

5 |

May 2025

Pages:

Publication Frequency:

Monthly (12 issues per year)

DOI
Digital Object Identifier
10.55041/IJSREM48086

License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Share this article:

Authors

AMS

Anant Manish Singh

KJJ

Krishna Jitendra Jaiswal.

DAR

Devesh Amlesh Rai

ABT

Arya Brijesh Tiwari

SSK

Shifa Siraj Khan.

SSL

Sanika Satish Lad

SRS

Sanika Rajan Shete

DSD

Disha Satyan Dahanukar

DSR

Darshit Sandeep Raut

KQ

Kaif Qureshi

Author Services & Downloads

Full Articles

Abstract

As AI systems increasingly influence high-stakes decision-making processes, the need for transparent and interpretable models has become paramount. However, despite significant research advancements in XAI techniques, there remains a notable absence of standardized evaluation frameworks to assess explanation quality, particularly for ambiguous learning models deployed in distributed cloud environments. This paper examines the critical challenges in developing standardized evaluation metrics for Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) within cloud-based infrastructures. This research identifies key barriers to standardization including the multidimensional nature of explanations, stakeholder diversity, operational constraints in cloud settings and the inherent complexity of modern AI systems. Through systematic analysis of current evaluation approaches, we propose a novel comprehensive evaluation framework with four core metrics: Fidelity Index (measuring truthfulness to the underlying model), Complexity Quotient (assessing cognitive accessibility), Operational Efficiency (quantifying resource requirements) and Stakeholder Alignment (evaluating relevance to different users). We validate our framework through empirical testing across three cloud platforms using both classification and natural language processing tasks, demonstrating significant improvements in explanation consistency (27.8%), stakeholder satisfaction (34.2%) and cross-platform standardization (41.3%) compared to existing approaches. Our findings reveal that effective standardization requires balancing technical rigor with contextual adaptability, addressing both objective computational measures and subjective human-centered assessments. This research contributes to the evolving discourse on XAI accountability by establishing a foundation for consistent, comparable evaluation standards that can accommodate the complexity of modern AI systems while meeting the varying needs of developers, users, regulators and cloud infrastructure providers.

KEYWORDS

Explainable AI Standardization Evaluation Metrics Cloud Infrastructure Ambiguous Learning Models XAI Frameworks Stakeholder Requirements Regulatory Compliance

Cite This Article

Anant Manish Singh, Krishna Jitendra Jaiswal., Devesh Amlesh Rai, Arya Brijesh Tiwari, Shifa Siraj Khan., Sanika Satish Lad, Sanika Rajan Shete, Disha Satyan Dahanukar, Darshit Sandeep Raut, Kaif Qureshi, "Challenges in Standardizing Explainable AI Metrics for Ambiguous Learning Models in Cloud Infrastructure," International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 9, no. 5, May 2025. https://doi.org/10.55041/IJSREM48086

Full Article/Conclusion

References

Editorial & Review Transparency

Publication Date

5/16/2025

Peer Review Type

Double-Blind Peer Review

Review Rounds: 2

Documents

Review Report (Confidential)
Copyright Form (Office)

Article Metrics & Impact

Article Views

0

Total views since publication

PDF Downloads

2

Total downloads since publication

Geographic Reach

5

Indexing, Archiving & Preservation

Google Scholar
Academia
ResearchGate
Crossref
SSRN
Semantic Scholar
Thomson Reuters
WorldCat
Mendeley
OpenAlex
EBSCO
Zenodo

Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.

Ethics, Compliance & Transparency

Plagiarism Screening

This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.

Funding Information

No funding information available for this research.

Similar & Recommended Articles

Similar Articles by Topic

Related research in the same subject area

Loading similar articles...