Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
10.55041/IJSREM22684
Volume:
7 |
6 |
Jun 2023
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
This paper presents a comprehensive comparison between two distinct bitcell designs: the 1:1:1 bitcell and the 1:2:2 bitcell. Bitcell analysis is a critical aspect of memory design, influencing system performance, power consumption, area efficiency, and reliability.The paper begins by introducing the two bitcell designs and their fundamental principles. The 1:1:1 bitcell represents a conventional single-ended bitcell architecture, widely used in various memory technologies. On the other hand, the 1:2:2 bitcell is a modified version featuring a differential read path, enabling improved read stability and enhanced noise immunity.A comprehensive performance evaluation is conducted, comparing the key metrics of the two bitcell designs. The analysis encompasses parameters such as read and write stability, read and write margins, power consumption, access time, and area efficiency. The impact of process variations, temperature variations, and supply voltage fluctuations on the performance of both bitcell designs is also investigated.In conclusion, this paper offers a comparative analysis of 1:1:1 and 1:2:2 bitcell designs, assessing their performance, reliability, and system-level implications. The findings serve as valuable insights for memory designers, researchers, and engineers, aiding in the selection and optimization of bitcell designs for next-generation memory architectures.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
9/5/2023
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
1
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...