Crossref DOIMemberCiteFactoropen accessissn
SJIF Impact Factor 8.659 | ISSN: 2582-3930
IJSREM Logo

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management

(Gateway to Global Scholars - An International, Scholarly, Multi-Disciplinary, Open Access Journal)

Peer-Reviewed Journal Designed to Meet UGC's Quality Parameters

HomeCurrent IssuePast IssuesPay OnlineConferencesEditorial BoardAbout UsContact Us
IJSREM

Loading article...

Follow Us

  • Google Scholar
  • ResearchGate
  • Academia.edu
  • Mendeley
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram

Journal Policies

  • Peer Review Policy
  • Publication Ethics
  • Copyright Infringement
  • Refund & Cancellation Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Journal Identifiers & Licenses

  • ISSN Verified: 2582-3930ISSN Verified: 2582-3930
  • Crossref DOI: 10.55041Crossref DOI: 10.55041
  • SJIF Ranking: 08.659SJIF Ranking: 08.659
  • Licensed under CC BY 4.0Licensed under CC BY 4.0
  • ISO Certification: 9001:2015ISO Certification: 9001:2015
  • Indexed & Cited In: Google ScholarIndexed & Cited In: Google Scholar

Contact Us

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management (IJSREM)

#62/1, New No 7, 1st Cross, 2nd Main, Ganganagar, R T Nagar, Bangalore North, Bangalore, Karnataka, India – 560032
[email protected]+91 93911 67991
logos
logos
Working Hours

Mon – Sat: 9:00 AM – 6:00 PM

Sunday: 10:00 AM – 4:00 PM

+91 93911 67991

© 2026 IJSREM – International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management. This is an open-access journal. Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
ArticlePeer ReviewedOpen AccessPlagiarism Passed
Paper ID:10.55041/IJSREM57982

Comparative Analysis of G+1 Building Using E-Tab and Staad Pro Software

Stream/Area:

-

Subject:

-

Paper ID:

10.55041/IJSREM57982

Volume:

10 |

3 |

Mar 2026

Pages:

Publication Frequency:

Monthly (12 issues per year)

DOI
Digital Object Identifier
10.55041/IJSREM57982

License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Share this article:

Authors

PM

Pranoti Mali

SJ

Shrutika Jadhav

Author Services & Downloads

Full Articles

Abstract

Structural analysis and design play a crucial role in ensuring the safety, stability, and durability of buildings. With the advancement of computer technology, structural engineering has increasingly relied on specialized software to perform complex calculations and analysis efficiently. Among the commonly used structural analysis programs, STAAD.Pro and ETABS are widely used in the design and analysis of building structures. These software tools enable engineers to model structures, apply loads, analyze structural behavior, and design structural members according to standard design codes. This study focuses on the comparative analysis of a G+1 building structure using STAAD.Pro and ETABS software. The primary objective of the study is to review and compare the analysis capabilities, modeling procedures, and structural outputs generated by the two software programs. The comparison includes important structural parameters such as bending moment, shear force, axial force, displacement, and support reactions obtained from the analysis of the building model. The review also examines previously published research studies related to structural analysis using these software platforms. By analyzing different research works, the study highlights similarities and differences in the results produced by STAAD.Pro and ETABS. The literature indicates that both software tools provide reliable structural analysis results when proper modeling techniques and load conditions are applied. However, ETABS is generally considered more suitable for building structures because of its specialized features for modeling beams, columns, slabs, and shear walls, while STAAD.Pro offers flexibility for analyzing a wide variety of structural systems. The findings of this study help civil engineering students and structural engineers understand the advantages, limitations, and practical applications of both software tools in structural analysis. The comparative approach also assists in selecting appropriate software for efficient structural design of buildings.

KEYWORDS

Cite This Article

Pranoti Mali, Shrutika Jadhav, "Comparative Analysis of G+1 Building Using E-Tab and Staad Pro Software," International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 10, no. 3, Mar 2026. https://doi.org/10.55041/IJSREM57982

Full Article/Conclusion

References

Editorial & Review Transparency

Publication Date

3/20/2026

Peer Review Type

Double-Blind Peer Review

Review Rounds: 2

Documents

Review Report (Confidential)
Copyright Form (Office)

Article Metrics & Impact

Article Views

0

Total views since publication

PDF Downloads

2

Total downloads since publication

Geographic Reach

5

Indexing, Archiving & Preservation

Google Scholar
Academia
ResearchGate
Crossref
SSRN
Semantic Scholar
Thomson Reuters
WorldCat
Mendeley
OpenAlex
EBSCO
Zenodo

Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.

Ethics, Compliance & Transparency

Plagiarism Screening

This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.

Funding Information

No funding information available for this research.

Similar & Recommended Articles

Similar Articles by Topic

Related research in the same subject area

Loading similar articles...