Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM56608
Volume:
10 |
2 |
Feb 2026
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Money management for people in India has changed, due to moving from their old method of income tax to a new method. Both of these methods exist together, as both methods were introduced at the same time in 2022. This research has compared these two methods of income tax for the assessment year of 2025-26, where the effect of deductions/exemptions/tax rates on overall tax liability was evaluated using five scenarios. The old method of income tax (old regime) allows a taxpayer to effectively plan how their funds will be allocated for long-term goals and provides several incentives for this (i.e., Section 80C, Section 80D, HRA, home loan interest). Likewise, the old regime requires a taxpayer to keep records for many transactions. The new income tax method (new regime), on the other hand, is structured to simplify recordkeeping for compliance, reduce tax rates, and ultimately increase take home pay for all taxpayers. Therefore, taxpayers that have no financial structure beyond a bank account or have limited savings are likely to benefit the most from using the new regime of income tax. The study found that middle-income earners and high-income earners will be impacted the most based on their choice of tax regime, while lower-income earners will benefit the most from the simplicity of the new income tax regime. Thus, which tax regime a person ultimately chooses is based on income, and their financial behavior with respect to savings habits and goals (long-term versus short-term), thus enabling them to make a well-informed decision about which tax regime they will choose to minimize their income taxes/financial planning.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
2/14/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
1
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
3
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...