Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
10.55041/IJSREM55847
Volume:
10 |
1 |
Jan 2026
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
The traditional concept of a rigidly defined job with specific, bounded responsibilities has undergone fundamental transformation in recent years. Contemporary employees are increasingly expected to perform tasks beyond traditional job descriptions, demonstrating flexibility, adaptability, and multi-functional capabilities. This phenomenon, termed “de-jobbing,” represents a significant shift from static, hierarchical work structures to dynamic, fluid role configurations. This research paper examines the evolving factors driving de-jobbing in the 2023-2025 period, providing a contemporary analysis that extends beyond earlier conceptualizations focused primarily on globalization and cost-cutting. Through comprehensive literature review synthesizing academic research, industry reports, and empirical workplace data, combined with analysis of recent trends in talent management, organizational design, and employment patterns, this study identifies both traditional and emerging drivers of de-jobbing. The research analyses the multidimensional implications of de-jobbing for organizations struggling to maintain coordination and culture in fluid environments, leaders who must develop new competencies to guide without traditional authority structures, HR functions tasked with redesigning systems built around obsolete job-based assumptions, and individual workers navigating careers without the clarity and security of defined roles. Finally, this paper proposes a contemporary framework for understanding workforce evolution in the post-pandemic era, positioning de-jobbing not as a temporary disruption but as a fundamental reimagining of the employment relationship and the organizing principles of productive activity in twenty-first-century knowledge economies.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
6/30/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
5
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...