Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM46579
Volume:
9 |
5 |
May 2025
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
The proliferation of AI-driven image manipulation techniques has positioned deepfake images as a notable threat to digital authenticity and public trust. This project centers on the implementation phase of a detection system aimed at identifying deepfake images through deep learning methodologies. A structured pipeline was established, commencing with the curation and preprocessing of datasets utilizing publicly available deepfake collections, such as FaceForensics++ and Celeb-DF. To enhance the robustness of the model, images underwent standardization processes including face alignment, cropping, and augmentation. In the evaluation phase, various advanced architectures were analyzed, encompassing Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) and transfer learning models such as XceptionNet, for the binary classification of genuine and fabricated images. The system’s training and fine-tuning involved the use of optimized hyperparameters and regularization techniques to mitigate the risk of overfitting. The assessment of performance was conducted through the application of metrics including accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and AUC-ROC. The results of the experiments indicate a high level of detection capacity, as the model attained significant accuracy on previously untested data and effectively generalized across various forms of manipulations. This implementation illustrates both the advantages and obstacles associated with the deployment of deepfake detection tools in practical scenarios. These challenges encompass concerns regarding adversarial robustness and the ability to generalize across diverse datasets.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
5/15/2025
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
2
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...