Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM60010
Volume:
10 |
4 |
April 2026
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
The increasing rates of multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacterial infections with the complication of biofilm formation can pose a significant threat to global public health. The present work has involved rational design, synthesis and overall antimicrobial assessment of new pyrazole-isoxazole hybrid scaffolds which target non-adherent as well as adherent bacterial groups. compounds, Nâ-[(1-(4-chlorophenyl)-1H-pyrazol-4-yl)methylidene]-3-phenylisoxazole-5-carbohydrazide (H1) and Nâ-[(1-(4-methoxyphenyl)-1H-pyrazol-4-yl)methylidene]-3-phenylisoxazole-5-carbohydrazide (H2), were synthesized via acid-catalyzed condensation of substituted pyrazole-4-carbaldehydes with 3-phenylisoxazole-5-carbohydrazide, achieving yields of 82-85%. The structural elucidation was done using the 1H-NMR, FT-IR, ESI-MS. In vitro antimicrobial evaluation against clinically relevant drug-resistant strains of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA ATCC-43300) and multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MDR-PA ATCC-27853) showed promising activity: MIC values were 6.25 to 25.0-μg/ml. It is worth highlighting that H2 with 4-methoxyphenyl substituent was more potent (MIC=6.25 μg/ml against MRSA) compared to the standard ciprofloxacin (MIC=16 μg/ml). Assays of crystal violet biofilm inhibition showed concentration-dependent effectiveness of antibiofilm; H2 exhibited 76.4% biofilm reduction at a half of MIC with MRSA. Time-kill kinetics proved the bactericidal effect, and > 4Log10 reduction of CFU at 2X MIC. These results set pyrazole-isoxazole hybrids as privileged scaffolds on the formation of subsequent-generation antimicrobials that can interfere with growth of bacteria and resistance by biofilm.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
4/13/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
0
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...