Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM52486
Volume:
9 |
9 |
Sep 2025
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
The rapid rise of online transactions spearheaded by e-commerce have restructured the global marketplace. Online transactions represent the highest level of convenience and efficiency, but have also posed a continuous threat of fraudulent activities that impact both customers and companies, and it is important to recognize that the rapid growth of e-commerce presents a problem of complexity predisposed to technological solutions to assist with amelioration. In this paper, we detail a systematic approach to engaging in fraud detection across many participants in an e-commerce transaction. The plan is based on building and validating several machine learning models to examine complex transactional data that considers multi-faceted dimensions. The classification machine learning models created include Random Forests, Support Vector Machines (SVM), Naive Bayes, Logistic Regression, and Gradient Boosting classifiers.Following the modeling, the classification schemes were unified in an experiment to examine each models’ accuracy in predicting between fraudulent and legitimate transactions. Our experience supports the precision regarding the random forest classifier (97.06% accurately classified). In this experiment we possessed a sizable dataset of transactional attributes, customer device and IP address details. The dataset was preprocessed utilizing techniques like standard scaling and one-hot encoding. Evaluation of models considered measures of Recall, accuracy, precision and F1 score on each models’ predictive abilities. Finally, we integrated the Random Forests classifier into a web application based on Flask
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
6/8/2025
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
2
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...