Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM58854
Volume:
10 |
4 |
April 2026
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Noise in clinical Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is a chronic and consequential impediment to automated brain tumor classification, degrading feature clarity at tumor boundaries and systematically limiting the discriminative power of deep learning models. This study presents a controlled comparative framework that directly quantifies the diagnostic benefit of Fast-DDPM generative denoising within a dual-branch evaluation pipeline: raw noisy MRI images are classified first by EfficientNet-B0 to establish a baseline, then the same images are restored by the Fast-DDPM denoiser and reclassified by the identical model checkpoint, and the two accuracy scores are compared. The classifier in both branches is EfficientNet-B0 with ImageNet-pretrained weights (IMAGENET1K_V1), a modified Linear(1280→4) classification head, Adam optimiser at lr = 1×10⁻⁴, CrossEntropyLoss, batch size 32, and five training epochs with Resize(224×224) preprocessing. The Brain Tumor MRI dataset (Figshare/Kaggle, four classes: Glioma, Meningioma, Pituitary, No Tumor) is partitioned into original and Fast-DDPM-enhanced splits. The baseline branch achieves 65.03% classification accuracy on raw noisy images. After Fast-DDPM preprocessing, the enhanced branch achieves 72.80%—an absolute gain of 7.77 percentage points, representing an 11.94% relative improvement, delivered without any modification to the classifier architecture, training procedure, or hyperparameters. These results establish generative diffusion preprocessing as a deployable, lightweight clinical strategy for improving automated brain tumor diagnostic accuracy.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
2/3/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
0
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...