Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM19131
Volume:
7 |
4 |
Apr 2023
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
In today’s digital age, social media is image-dominated, making visuals a central tool for communication and dissemination of information. This extensive usage of images, however, has also given rise to their malicious exploitation by means of intentional manipulation, mostly in the form of producing fictitious or false content. Image forgery—modifying images to deceive audiences—has emerged as a key problem, perpetuating the spread of misinformation, cyberattacks, and even legal issues. In response to the increasing problem, deep learning algorithms have become an effective solution in identifying fake images. Specifically, Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), a branch of deep learning algorithms, are very effective at identifying subtle inconsistencies in images. By conducting pixel-level analysis, CNNs can discover unnatural visual patterns, tiny inconsistencies, and indications of manipulation that go unnoticed by the human eye. CNNs are efficient at detecting prevalent forms of image forgery like splicing, copy-move, and retouching, by examining prominent image features such as edges, texture, and lighting irregularities. Out of numerous techniques, the combination of Error Level Analysis (ELA) with CNN structures has emerged with tremendous potential for detecting tampered areas. CNNs can learn from very large datasets including original and tampered images and make accurate classifications and localizations of forged content. Therefore, deep learning—specifically CNNs in conjunction with ELA—has been a very effective solution to counter the growing problem of image forgery, thus improving credibility and reliability in digital media.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
8/4/2025
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
3
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...