Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM31985
Volume:
8 |
4 |
Apr 2024
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
As time has gone on, investor expectations and attitudes have also changed to reflect the dynamic nature of risk and its variable sources. The process by which investors used to make investment decisions has changed as a result of the general unpredictability of the investment horizon. The corporate entities have been making every effort to achieve the fundamental business objectives while taking into account the type of investors and ensuring dividend policy optimization. Consequently, corporations and the investment community are exploring various dividend criteria and qualities in order to optimize their benefits, both qualitatively and quantitatively. As a result, the stakeholder community’s ongoing activities have accelerated the evolution of theoretical and empirical concerns pertaining to dividend policy.Theoretical arguments concerning dividends, which date back to the groundbreaking research of Linter (1954) and Modigliani & Miller (1961), opened the door for a thorough emergence of arguments for and against it, which the esteemed figures in the finance and investing fields progressively came to refer to as the “dividend puzzle.” The question of whether or not to pay dividends has taken the form of several theoretical claims that address various aspects to which the community of stakeholders is exposed. As a result, ideas have been categorized according to how relevant or irrelevant the dividend policy is to the community of stakeholders. Prominent scholars have advanced a variety of views about the dividend policy dichotomy. According to the irrelevance proposition, dividend policy only has an impact on the amount of outside funding needed for projects that have a positive net present value, meaning that every dollar delivered to shareholders represents a capital loss. This hypothesis states that the company’s unique investment strategy, not the dividend policy that companies adhere to, is the only factor limiting the company’s market value. This
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
12/31/45410
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
1
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...