Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM53733
Volume:
9 |
11 |
Nov 2025
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
The increasing occurrence of explosions from terrorism, industrial accidents, and military conflicts has highlighted the vulnerability of high-rise buildings to blast-induced forces. Traditional reinforced concrete (RCC) structures are primarily designed for static loads and often lack adequate resilience against dynamic, short-duration blast loads. This study focuses on the dynamic analysis of vertical irregular RCC buildings, specifically G+15, G+20, and G+25 structures, incorporating soft-storey configurations that are known to be highly susceptible to damage under impulsive loads. Blast loads are calculated following IS 4991:1968 and TM5-1300 standards, considering parameters such as peak overpressure, impulse duration, and standoff distance. The structural behavior under these loads is modeled and analyzed using ETABS through time-history simulations and finite element analysis (FEA). The study evaluates critical response parameters including displacement, inter-storey drift, shear forces, and base shear, comparing regular and irregular building configurations under varying blast scenarios. Results indicate that soft-storey irregularities significantly amplify deformations and drifts, particularly at lower floors and under closer blast proximity. The findings highlight the importance of strategic reinforcement, optimal shear wall placement, and material enhancements to improve blast resistance. This research provides valuable insights for designing safer and more resilient high-rise structures, contributing to enhanced structural performance in high-risk zones and informing guidelines for blast-resistant design in vertical irregular buildings.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
10/10/2025
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
5
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...