Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM53757
Volume:
9 |
11 |
Nov 2025
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Elevated water tanks are vital components of urban and rural water supply networks, functioning as lifeline structures whose performance during seismic events directly impacts public safety and infrastructure resilience. The staging system, which supports the tank container, plays a crucial role in governing the dynamic behavior of the structure under lateral earthquake forces. However, conventional design approaches lack comprehensive comparative evaluation of different staging configurations, particularly in high seismic zones where stiffness, displacement, and time period significantly influence structural stability. This study investigates the seismic performance of elevated water tanks by comparing reinforced concrete (RCC) column staging and RCC shaft staging systems through detailed analytical modeling and dynamic response assessment. A three-dimensional structural model is developed and analyzed using response spectrum method in accordance with IS 1893 (Part 2) seismic provisions. Key response parameters including base shear, lateral displacement, natural time period, stiffness, and overall stability are evaluated for both staging arrangements. The results indicate that RCC shaft staging exhibits higher stiffness, lower displacement, and reduced time periods compared to column staging, demonstrating superior resistance to seismic forces. The findings highlight the significance of optimized staging selection to enhance seismic safety, serviceability, and structural reliability of elevated water tanks. This study contributes to improved design insights for earthquake-resilient water storage infrastructure in seismically active regions.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
10/10/2025
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
4
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...